2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14723-9_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forgetting the Words but Remembering the Meaning: Modeling Forgetting in a Verbal and Semantic Tag Recommender

Abstract: We assume that recommender systems are more successful, when they are based on a thorough understanding of how people process information. In the current paper we test this assumption in the context of social tagging systems. Cognitive research on how people assign tags has shown that they draw on two interconnected levels of knowledge in their memory: on a conceptual level of semantic fields or topics, and on a lexical level that turns patterns on the semantic level into words. Another strand of tagging resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the cognitive-inspired BLLAC +MPr approach that has the highest recommender accuracy also provides fair results in terms of the other metrics. Interestingly, this is not the case for the other cognitive-inspired algorithm 3LT+MPr which has poor runtime and memory consumption estimates since it requires a computationally expensive topic calculation step (see [9]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additionally, the cognitive-inspired BLLAC +MPr approach that has the highest recommender accuracy also provides fair results in terms of the other metrics. Interestingly, this is not the case for the other cognitive-inspired algorithm 3LT+MPr which has poor runtime and memory consumption estimates since it requires a computationally expensive topic calculation step (see [9]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Research papers Model of human categorization [17,23,35] Activation processes in human memory [18,21,24,37] Informal learning se ings [5][6][7] Resource recommendations Research papers A ention-interpretation dynamics [15,34] Tag and time information [27,28] Recommendation evaluation Research papers Real-world folksonomies [20] Technology enhanced learning se ings [16] Hashtag recommendations…”
Section: Tag Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First simulation-based analyses of large-scale social tagging datasets (Kowald et al, 2014) have shown this strategy to be successful in modeling and predicting users' tag choices. The question, however, whether these results (i.e., high prediction accuracies) generalize to a realistic information search scenario, and whether tags can be recommended the employees actually adopt for their tag assignments, remains open and is addressed in the following.…”
Section: Modeling Search Of Memory To Disambiguate the Tag Recommendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example for a very simple strategy is represented by "most popular" recommenders which assume that what has been applied by many in the past is a good predictor for future assignments. Despite their simplicity, Most Popular Tag (MPT) recommenders work surprisingly well in predicting tag reuse in offline studies (Jäschke et al, 2007;Kowald et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%