2015
DOI: 10.1037/14526-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forgiveness therapy: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
335
0
39

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
335
0
39
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is no universal definition of forgiveness, it is generally accepted that when a person forgives, his or her thoughts, feelings, and behaviors toward the offender become less negative and more positive (McCullough, Kilpatrick, Emmons, & Larson, 2001). However, some authors (e.g., North, 1987; for a review see Worthington, 2005) highlight forgiveness as the reduction of negative responses toward the offender (i.e., anger, rumination, revenge) while others emphasize the experience of positive affect (i.e., sympathy, benevolence, love) toward the transgressor as a critical part of complete forgiveness (Enright & Fitzgibbons, 2014;Worthington, 2006). Worthington (2005) observed that when the offenders are strangers, in poor, non-valued, or non-continuing relationships, the focus is on reducing negative emotions and motives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no universal definition of forgiveness, it is generally accepted that when a person forgives, his or her thoughts, feelings, and behaviors toward the offender become less negative and more positive (McCullough, Kilpatrick, Emmons, & Larson, 2001). However, some authors (e.g., North, 1987; for a review see Worthington, 2005) highlight forgiveness as the reduction of negative responses toward the offender (i.e., anger, rumination, revenge) while others emphasize the experience of positive affect (i.e., sympathy, benevolence, love) toward the transgressor as a critical part of complete forgiveness (Enright & Fitzgibbons, 2014;Worthington, 2006). Worthington (2005) observed that when the offenders are strangers, in poor, non-valued, or non-continuing relationships, the focus is on reducing negative emotions and motives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemaafan dapat menjadi metode koping yang memungkinkan seseorang mengalihkan perhatiannya dari pengalaman hidup yang tidak menyenangkan dan membawa seseorang tumbuh, berkembang dan hidup bermakna serta berkualitas (Enright, 2002;Thompson dkk., 2005).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Proses ini merupakan teknik terapi yang paling memberikan manfaat karena semua subjek menjadi paham mengenai kondisi objek pemaafan sehingga membuat diri lebih mudah untuk menerima dan memaafkan. Teknik Imagery pada sesi V dan VI merupakan teknik koping untuk mengatasi ketakutan-ketakutan dan kecemasan-kecemasan yang dimiliki (Wilding & Milne, 2009) dengan membantu subjek berlatih untuk membayangkan koping yang akan digunakan dalam mengantisipasi situasi sulit yang mungkin akan dihadapi di masa depan (Curwen, Palmer, & Ruddel, 2002) serta menumbuhkan empati pada objek pemaafan (Enright, 2002). Proses pelaksanaannya, terdapat beberapa subjek yang mampu membayangkan dan menghadirkan sosok yakni objek pemaafannya untuk dimaafakan.…”
Section: Rogers (Dalamunclassified
“…Established clinical interventions (e.g., Enright, 2001) could be adjusted to incorporate multicultural issues including emphasizing aspects of Islam, the Qur'an, hadith, and jurisprudence. In so doing, Western forgiveness interventions could become more culturally congruent with Islamic values.…”
Section: Implications For Future Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%