2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-009-0310-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Form error removal of sanded wood surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A surface roughness methodology for measuring and evaluation of surface data proposed by Gurau et al 26 was used in this research. The methodology was born from previous research experience, which indicated a stylus instrument as reliable for wood surfaces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A surface roughness methodology for measuring and evaluation of surface data proposed by Gurau et al 26 was used in this research. The methodology was born from previous research experience, which indicated a stylus instrument as reliable for wood surfaces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,5 However, in this research, the specimens (four replicates for each WPC combination) were scanned on tracing lengths of 50 mm, because longer tracing length gave more accurate results. 26 Four profiles were recorded for each specimen, two on each specimen face, so that a total of 16 profiles were available for further evaluation of parameters for each WPC combination. The profiles were measured in areas which displayed, as much as possible, homogeneity of the mixture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A new available standard (ISO 25178-2 2012) allows these criteria to be defined in three dimensions (Ramananantoandro et al 2013). However, if the difficulties related to wood anisotropy are solved with contactless devices, 3D surface roughness criteria and the use of a minimum sensing surface (Larricq et al 2000), the problems related to signal filtering remain (Gurau et al 2009). Moreover, it is still difficult to separate the influence of the wood structure itself and that of the machining operation, although for some authors, valley depth parameters seem particularly well suited to characterising the features of wood anatomy (Cool 2011;Khazaeian 2006).…”
Section: Geometrical Characterisation Of Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%