2008
DOI: 10.1002/ad.637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Form, Force, Performance: Multi‐Parametric Structural Design

Abstract: In the 20th century, the classification of structures according to defined building typologies was central to engineering design. Here Professor Klaus Bollinger, Professor Manfred Grohmann and Oliver Tessmann of design engineers Bollinger + Grohmann challenge this preconception. By considering each structure as an individual case in point with inherently complex behaviour, they move away from the notion of a building being a variant of an established type. They further discuss this mode of working, in relation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometry of form in the concept design has been achieved by contouring and traced using the Rhinoceros freeform modeler. Mutsuro Sasaki, who developed the concept of "Morphogenesis Flux Structure" [67], whilst working with SANAA, Bollinger + Grohman, and Arup, implemented this new shape-analysis approach for waving slabs, which he called Extended ESO (EESO) [68,69]. The Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO) can also be understood as an evolutionary design tool, one that is not limited by the availability of calculation and methods of analysis.…”
Section: Challenge: Rainwater Collection Flood Prevention and Leisurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of form in the concept design has been achieved by contouring and traced using the Rhinoceros freeform modeler. Mutsuro Sasaki, who developed the concept of "Morphogenesis Flux Structure" [67], whilst working with SANAA, Bollinger + Grohman, and Arup, implemented this new shape-analysis approach for waving slabs, which he called Extended ESO (EESO) [68,69]. The Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO) can also be understood as an evolutionary design tool, one that is not limited by the availability of calculation and methods of analysis.…”
Section: Challenge: Rainwater Collection Flood Prevention and Leisurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each case, a large number of requirements can be expected to be satisfied by the structural system, which do not only include load bearing capacity and safety, but also other interrelated aspects. With this respect, Bollinger et al (2008) intend the structure as an integral part of architecture, in which the overall performance balances a complex network of multifaceted, interrelated requirements; this makes each structural design being somehow unique (Billington, 1983). Among the many requirements, some are here considered based on their common occurrence.…”
Section: § 421 Structural Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of such approaches can be found in Winslow et al (2008), where a method to map grids into a given surface is described and integrated with an optimization process to locate the structural nodes (Winslow et al, 2010). With a similar goal, Bollinger et al (2008) analyse and identify the regions of given shapes that can be altered to satisfy the structural performance without affecting other architectural performances. Such methods have been consistently used for large projects, such as for the structural design of the BMW Welt project by Coop Himmelb(l)au.…”
Section: Conceptual Design and Structural Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each case, a large number of requirements can be expected to be satisfied by the structural system, which do not only include load bearing capacity and safety, but also other interrelated aspects. With this respect, Bollinger et al (2008) intend the structure as an integral part of architecture, in which the overall performance balances a complex network of multifaceted, interrelated requirements; this makes each structural design being somehow unique (Billington, 1983). Among the many requirements, some are here considered based on their common occurrence.…”
Section: § 421 Structural Performancementioning
confidence: 99%