Private households consume about 30 % of Germany's total primary energy and cause about 15 % of the total CO2 emissions, and so this sector represents a key sector for climate protection targets. Whereas primary energy consumption in buildings is limited by regulations, the production of carbon emissions‐intensive materials is only moving slowly into the focus of legislation, regulations and, ultimately, the perception of society. Considering a thermally conditioned building during its life cycle, most environmental effects are during operation. Nevertheless, the grey energy of a concrete structure can add up to 20 % in individual cases. Owing to the carbon‐intensive cement production, concrete as a material causes relatively high environmental impacts. Logical options appear to be substituting cement with so called by‐products or using recycled additives. In fact, there are only a few projects that have used a resource‐saving concrete. In 2010 in Ludwigshafen, one building in a group of buildings was chosen as the first building in Germany to be built almost completely from recycled concrete without increasing the cement content. It was built as a low‐energy construction and in a zero‐carbon‐emissions area. The project was supported scientifically by the Institute of Energy and Environmental Research in Heidelberg and the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus. The buildings won the Construction Prize 2011 with the distinction “best relation between quality and costs”. This paper discusses integral aspects of the use of recycling concrete from the structural design, eco‐accounting and materials properties perspectives. It demonstrates the potential and opportunities for the quality‐assured use of recycling concrete for sustainable resource management.
In the 20th century, the classification of structures according to defined building typologies was central to engineering design. Here Professor Klaus Bollinger, Professor Manfred Grohmann and Oliver Tessmann of design engineers Bollinger + Grohmann challenge this preconception. By considering each structure as an individual case in point with inherently complex behaviour, they move away from the notion of a building being a variant of an established type. They further discuss this mode of working, in relation to their own recent projects, in terms of relevant methods and generative techniques, as well as the respective consequences that it has had on the relationship between force, form and structural performance. ArchiGlobe, Lakehouse Patagonia, Argentina, 2007 Different versions of the Lakehouse structure are derived by a generative digital process driven by stochastic as well as arithmetic parameters. Dominique Perrault, Undergound station roof, Piazza Garibaldi, Naples, Italy, 2007 Competiton proposal for the differentiated branching structure. Analysis of the specific load-bearing behaviour of each individual branching structure derived through the evolutionary process. Text © 2008 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Images: pp 20, 22, 23, 25(r) © Bollinger + Grohmann; p 24(tl) © Bollinger + Grohmann, ArchiGlobe; p 24(tr) © Perrault Projets/Adagp; p 24(br) © Fabian Scheurer, designproduction, Zurich; p 25(l) © Cyrille Thomas and SANAA SANAA, Learning Centre, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2008-The artificial landscape of the new Learning Centre includes patios, openings and shell-like regions.Visualisation of the distribution of tension forces within the landscape-like structure.
Computational design techniques are changing the role of analysis tools in collaborations between architects and engineers. Digital feedback loops of synthesis, analysis and evaluation establish a ‘process of becoming’ in which structural solutions evolve and adapt to specific requirements. Highly differentiated constructions are possible when digital techniques are fully integrated in design and production. Klaus Bollinger, Manfred Grohmann and Oliver Tessmann discuss these novel paradigms in relation to recent projects from engineering office Bollinger + Grohmann. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
A complementary way to investigate the Hadron-Quark-Gluon Phase transition in heavy ion collisions is to analyze properties of dense astrophysical objects, i.e. neutron stars. A neutron star can be simply described as a giant nucleus. However, due to the enormous gravitational contraction, it can reach densities up to several times the density found in the Pb nucleus. This property allows the formation of a core made up of free quarks and gluons. Once this new phase is formed, the new state drastically changes the neutron star macroscopic properties, such as its mass and radius. In the present work, we follow a route opposite to the common sense, investigating the properties of the phase transition by analyzing neutron star properties of mass and radius. This observations can determine the density where the transition can occur or the order of the transition using some sort of reverse engineering. As a consequence, the values of the bag constant or the strong coupling constant can be inferred.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.