2019
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2018.2865240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formalizing Visualization Design Knowledge as Constraints: Actionable and Extensible Models in Draco

Abstract: There exists a gap between visualization design guidelines and their application in visualization tools. While empirical studies can provide design guidance, we lack a formal framework for representing design knowledge, integrating results across studies, and applying this knowledge in automated design tools that promote effective encodings and facilitate visual exploration. We propose modeling visualization design knowledge as a collection of constraints, in conjunction with a method to learn weights for soft… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
217
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
217
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As more work is done to explore and test new visualization designs, GEViT will incorporate these designs, potentially resulting in the addition of new typological terms. It will also be interesting to explore how GEViT might be used to suggest visualizations to researchers, as is currently done with common statistical charts in tools like Tableau's "Show Me" feature (Mackinlay et al, 2007), Google Sheets' "Chart Suggestions", or in novel systems like Draco (Moritz, 2018).…”
Section: Implications Of Our Findings For Visualization Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more work is done to explore and test new visualization designs, GEViT will incorporate these designs, potentially resulting in the addition of new typological terms. It will also be interesting to explore how GEViT might be used to suggest visualizations to researchers, as is currently done with common statistical charts in tools like Tableau's "Show Me" feature (Mackinlay et al, 2007), Google Sheets' "Chart Suggestions", or in novel systems like Draco (Moritz, 2018).…”
Section: Implications Of Our Findings For Visualization Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts include both visualization recommendation systems as well as visualization exploration tools. Among these, visualization recommendation systems like Draco [Moritz et al 2019], CompassQL [Wongsuphasawat et al 2016a], and ShowMe [Mackinlay et al 2007] recommend top completions of an incomplete visualization program. On the other hand, visualization exploration tools, such as VisExamplar [Saket et al 2017b], Visualization-by-Sketching [Schroeder and Keefe 2016], Polaris [Stolte et al 2008], and Voyager [Wongsuphasawat et al 2016b, aim to generate diverse visualizations based on user demonstrations, which can include graphical sketches, manipulation trajectories, and constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voyager extends prior work by automatic generation of a diverse set of visualizations [38]. Draco supports the design of visualizations by encapsulating design knowledge as constraints [30]. Kim and Heer [24] consider analysis tasks to recommend effective visual encoding for automated visualization design.…”
Section: Visualization Recommendation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%