Modern life is increasingly dependent on space technologies
such as satellite communication, positioning, and remote
sensing, but the political system that has enabled these
advances remains fragile. In this essay, we highlight
normative contestation—disagreements between space
stakeholders in how operators should be expected to
behave—in the geosynchronous orbital regime (GEO) as
a threat to a secure and sustainable space domain. This
conflict stems primarily from the interactions between
limited resources (e.g. physical space, electromagnetic
spectrum assignments) and the emphasis on maintaining
total state sovereignty and independence of policy in the
international arena. To preserve the peaceful use of the
GEO regime, space actors must act soon to establish norms
of behavior that dissuade maneuvers which place satellites
close together on orbit.