Abstract:The problems of intellectual property market development have been investigated. It is proved that without the successful functioning of this market it is impossible to ensure the innovative development of the country. The characteristics of the intellectual property market, as well as the factors restraining its development, have been determined. The most important of them are significant volumes of outflow of Ukrainian scientists to foreign countries, low quality of Ukrainian patents, high level of counterfe… Show more
“…These sub-categories were then organized into four main categories of phases in IP commercialization: ideation, development, creation, and commercialization (Table 2). (Ravi & Janodia, 2022); (Hayter & Link, 2022), (Mets et al, 2016), (Maslak & Pererva, 2023), (Damij et al, 2022), (Kodynetz & Maidanyk, 2019), (Pererva & Maslak, 2022) Identification Ideation…”
Section: Statistical Description and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research, Product development (Deshpande & Nagendra, 2020), (Tsybulev, 2014), (Maslak & Pererva, 2023), (Mets et al, 2016), (Kusmintarti et al, 2022), (Kruachottikul et al, 2023), (Vimalnath et al, 2022), (Park & Kang, 2015) R&D Development…”
Section: Blending the Knowledge Base On Ip Commercialization Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal protection, Registration, IP rights (Kodynetz & Maidanyk, 2019), (Maslak & Pererva, 2023), (Kusmintarti et al, 2022) Protection & legal consideration…”
Section: Blending the Knowledge Base On Ip Commercialization Phasesmentioning
This study aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of intellectual property (IP) commercialization in the creative industry, highlighting its essential role in the growth of the sector. 16 relevant articles were analyzed, resulting in the development of a four-phase model of IP commercialization: ideation, development, creation, and commercialization. These phases are combined with the concept of creativity-based innovation specific to the creative industry to form an integrative framework. Each phase emphasizes the interaction between divergent thinking and sequential processes in the commercialization journey while highlighting the central role of creativity at each stage. The findings of this study contribute to the academic discourse and provide practical guidance for practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders in developing IP commercialization strategies in the creative industry.
“…These sub-categories were then organized into four main categories of phases in IP commercialization: ideation, development, creation, and commercialization (Table 2). (Ravi & Janodia, 2022); (Hayter & Link, 2022), (Mets et al, 2016), (Maslak & Pererva, 2023), (Damij et al, 2022), (Kodynetz & Maidanyk, 2019), (Pererva & Maslak, 2022) Identification Ideation…”
Section: Statistical Description and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research, Product development (Deshpande & Nagendra, 2020), (Tsybulev, 2014), (Maslak & Pererva, 2023), (Mets et al, 2016), (Kusmintarti et al, 2022), (Kruachottikul et al, 2023), (Vimalnath et al, 2022), (Park & Kang, 2015) R&D Development…”
Section: Blending the Knowledge Base On Ip Commercialization Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legal protection, Registration, IP rights (Kodynetz & Maidanyk, 2019), (Maslak & Pererva, 2023), (Kusmintarti et al, 2022) Protection & legal consideration…”
Section: Blending the Knowledge Base On Ip Commercialization Phasesmentioning
This study aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of intellectual property (IP) commercialization in the creative industry, highlighting its essential role in the growth of the sector. 16 relevant articles were analyzed, resulting in the development of a four-phase model of IP commercialization: ideation, development, creation, and commercialization. These phases are combined with the concept of creativity-based innovation specific to the creative industry to form an integrative framework. Each phase emphasizes the interaction between divergent thinking and sequential processes in the commercialization journey while highlighting the central role of creativity at each stage. The findings of this study contribute to the academic discourse and provide practical guidance for practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders in developing IP commercialization strategies in the creative industry.
“…Our review of the literature [5,6,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and practical development of strategies for the commercialization of intellectual products show that a large number of various strategies for the commercialization of intellectual products have been created and are used in practice. These strategies, to one degree or another, determine the need to create or find suitable conditions or combinations of certain circumstances, which with a high probability could lead to the successful introduction of intelligent products into the economic circulation.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this concerns the determination of the content, place, and role of commercialization in the field of industrial production, problems of program-target management and the development of a commercialization strategy at enterprises of the machine-building industry [11,13]. At the same time, the potential of mechanical engineering production is not sufficiently studied in modern economic literature, therefore the formation of strategies for introduction into economic circulation in this industry is relevant and important [14][15][16]. Thus, relevance is determined not only by the importance of devising an effective strategy for the introduction of intelligent products into the economic circulation in the field of industrial production.…”
The object of research is the process that forms strategies and methods for effective commercialization of intellectual products at industrial enterprises. The problems of introducing intellectual property objects into the economic circulation in the field of industrial production have been analyzed. The most important of them are economic and managerial problems, which consist in the lack of necessary funding and are determined by the difficulty of assessing the market competitiveness of an intellectual product. Special attention was paid to market, technical-technological, and legal problems, the presence of which inhibits the development of the technological market and significantly affects the efficiency of intellectual and innovative activities. The presence of these problems predetermined the main goal of the study – to devise methods and strategies for the commercialization of intellectual property objects.
Three basic strategies for the commercialization of intellectual products have been studied: the strategy of promoting an intellectual product, the strategy of diffusion of innovations, and the strategy of accumulating maximum income. Based on them, an integrated strategy for the commercialization of intelligent products for enterprises of the machine-building industry, which is oriented towards achieving the goals of maximizing the economic and social effect of the production of an intelligent product, was formed and substantiated. The main component of an integrated strategy is an organizational mechanism that provides investment support for innovative activities and scientific and consulting support for an intellectual product.
The research results could be used to form programs of intellectual and innovative activity of industrial enterprises and would serve as a basis for further scientific research on these issues
The object of research is the relationship between the processes of formation of the information-network society and the global-local transformation of property relations at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries. The problem has been identified that the limitations of theoretical approaches to explain the content and interrelation of property relations and the social meaning of high-tech development have led to an increase in general socio-economic instability. To solve the problem, the definition of the institution of property as an economic good is provided. A three-level traditional model of public management has been highlighted. It is shown that the existing triple structure of the public sector of economy should acquire a different value content. The new model in the dynamic unity of markets of pure public benefits, public goods, private goods harmonizes public interests, strengthens relations of trust. This model forms the foundations for the formation of nanoeconomics in a broad sense as the forerunner of harmonious institutional architectonics of the economy. Nanoeconomics, as part of baby economics, human economics, and economics of nanotechnology, is based on the principles of rational behavior in making economic decisions within the limits of power. In the depths of baby economics, skills and competencies are formed in handling property. The human economy ensures the proper implementation of property functions. Within the experimental part of the study, a mathematical model of multifactor regression is constructed. The model confirmed the presence of dense dependence (0.9076) of the growth of GDP per capita on the state of distribution of property rights in the national economy. The area of practical use of the results is the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine's economy through the activation of its domestic business potential.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.