2016
DOI: 10.2109/jcersj2.15259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of grain boundary second phase in BaTiO<sub>3</sub> polycrystal under a high DC electric field at elevated temperatures

Abstract: The microstructure of the damaged area created during a flash sintering event in BaTiO 3 was examined by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and electron energy loss spectrometry (EELS) measurement. A DC electric field of 133 V/cm was applied to a fully-densified BaTiO 3 body prepared by conventional sintering, and the specimen temperature was elevated at a constant heating rate. The flash sintering event, at which the electric current in the specimen abruptly increases at the threshold fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
23
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at between 0.6m for 250V/cm and 0.3-0.4m for 500V/cm the grain size in the flash sintered samples was significantly smaller than for conventional sintering (15m after 1h) [109]. M'Peko et al [109] also demonstrated that raising the current density limit too high can result in significant inhomogeneities in the microstructure, which is confirmed in a later study by Yoshida et al [35] who examined damage in barium titanate polycrystalline ceramics exposed to electric fields of 133V/cm. Layers of second phase material with reduced barium content were found at the grain boundaries, suggesting that electric conduction through the grain boundaries may trigger the flash sintering event in barium titanate.…”
Section: Ferroelectric Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, at between 0.6m for 250V/cm and 0.3-0.4m for 500V/cm the grain size in the flash sintered samples was significantly smaller than for conventional sintering (15m after 1h) [109]. M'Peko et al [109] also demonstrated that raising the current density limit too high can result in significant inhomogeneities in the microstructure, which is confirmed in a later study by Yoshida et al [35] who examined damage in barium titanate polycrystalline ceramics exposed to electric fields of 133V/cm. Layers of second phase material with reduced barium content were found at the grain boundaries, suggesting that electric conduction through the grain boundaries may trigger the flash sintering event in barium titanate.…”
Section: Ferroelectric Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Ceramic materials moulded into bars [35] and dogbones [20] with rectangular cross-sections and pellets of various diameter to height ratios [36][37][38] have all been flash sintered ( Figure 4). Flash sintered samples generally have small dimensions [28].…”
Section: Specimen Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the flash experiments are controlled by limiting the current density immediate to the flash event. If this limitation is removed, the excess Joule heat may locally melt the compact [35], or fully melt the glass (see supplement in Ref. [4]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of liquid residue in many flash sintered microstructures may be due to the limited extent of the softened/melted surface (i.e., a few atomic layers at the particle surfaces) as well as due to its metastable and transient nature. Nevertheless, when formation of high-temperature liquid led to selective evaporation of some elements, liquidlike phases were observed at the particle surfaces and grain boundaries [35,36]. Nevertheless, local melting was observed at the pore surfaces during flash spark plasma sintering (FSPS) of thermoelectric Sb-doped magnesium-tin silicide [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%