The d 2 -hexahydride complex OsH 6 (P i Pr 3 ) 2 (1) promotes the activation of C−H bonds of 2,2′-bipyridines and related heterocycles. The study of the same reactions with the deuteride counterpart OsD 6 (P i Pr 3 ) 2 (1-d) reveals that the activation of the C−H bonds situated in the sterically less hindered positions is kinetically preferred. However, the isolated products are the result of the thermodynamic control of the reactions. Thus, reactions of 1 with 2,2′-bipyridine, 6-phenyl-2,2′-bipyridine, and 6-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine give the "rollover cyclometalation" products OsH 3 {κ 2 -C,N-[C 5 (R)H 2 N-py]}(P i Pr 3 ) 2 (R = H (2), Ph (3), Me (4)), whereas 3,5-dimethyl-6-phenyl-2,2′-bipyridine affords OsH 2 {κ 3 -C,N,C-[C 5 H 3 N-(Me) 2 py-C 5 H 4 ]}(P i Pr 3 ) 2 (5), containing a dianionic C,N,C-pincer ligand. The behavior of substrates pyridyl-benzimidazolium and -imidazolium is similar. Reaction of 1 with 3-methyl-1-(6-phenylpyridin-2-yl)-1H-benzimidazolium tetrafluoroborate leads to OsH 3 {κ 2 -C,C-[MeBzim-C 5 (Ph)H 2 N]}(P i Pr 3 ) 2 (6), bearing an anionic C py ,C NHCchelate. On the other hand, 3-methyl-1-(6-phenylpyridin-2-yl)-1H-imidazolium tetrafluoroborate yields [OsH 2 {κ 3 -C,N,C-(MeIm-py-C 6 H 4 )}(P i Pr 3 ) 2 ]BF 4 (7), containing a monoanionic C,N,C-pincer with a NHC-unit coordinated in an abnormal fashion. The reactivity pattern of these substrates is also observed with the d 4 -iridium-pentahydride IrH 5 (P i Pr 3 ) 2 (8), which has generated IrH 2 {κ 2 -C,N-[C 5 (R)H 2 N-py]}(P i Pr 3 ) 2 (R = H, (9), Ph (10)) and IrH{κ 3 -C,N,C-[C 5 H 3 N-(Me 2 )py-C 5 H 4 ]}(P i Pr 3 ) 2 (11). The osmium(IV)−carbon bonds display a higher degree of covalency than the iridium(III)−carbon bonds. In contrast to 2, the metalated carbon atom of 9 undergoes the addition of a proton of methanol to give [IrH 2 {κ 2 -N,N-(bipy)}(P i Pr 3 ) 2 ]BF 4 (12).