“…41 On the basis of the above findings, we suppose that, around T C , the contribution of Coulomb interactions to the formation energy of the lattice is comparable, and however, the contribution of magnetic couplings to the formation energy of the lattice is significantly different for the HTP and the LTP in the [F x Cl 1− x -BzPy][Ni(mnt) 2 ] ( x = 0–1) crystals. Taking [F-BzPy][Ni(mnt) 2 ] as an example, the magnetic coupling energy is estimated to be ∼0.13 kJ mol −1 (= J / k B × 8.31 × 10 –3 kJ mol −1 ) in the HTP and ∼1.87 kJ mol −1 ( = Δ /(2 k B ) × 8.31 × 10 –3 kJ mol −1 ) in the LTP, and the magnetic coupling energy is close to the intermolecular van der Waals interaction energy (generally, less than 5 kJ mol −1 ) in the LTP, 42 but it is much higher than that in the HTP, and this leads to the crystal structure being more thermodynamically stable in the LTP than that in the HTP, and the lattice vibrations assist the transformation between the HTP and the LTP in [F-BzPy][Ni(mnt) 2 ], and this case is similar to that in the spin-Peierls transition.…”