2021
DOI: 10.1130/b36020.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of the crater suevite sequence from the Chicxulub peak ring: A petrographic, geochemical, and sedimentological characterization

Abstract: This study presents a new classification of a ∼100-m-thick crater suevite sequence in the recent International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP)-International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP) Expedition 364 Hole M0077A drill core to better understand the formation of suevite on top of the Chicxulub peak ring. We provide an extensive data set for this succession that consists of whole-rock major and trace element compositional data (n = 212) and petrographic data supported by digital image analysis. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(184 reference statements)
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This material is thought to be formed by MWI and high energy transport of fragmented melt rock (Gulick et al, 2019;Osinski et al, 2020;F. M. Schulte et al, 2021) that bear similarities with hyaloclastite deposits (Kaskes et al, 2021). The impact melt rocks at Site M0077 are too thin to be resolved in FWI velocity models (Figures 5 and 9), but we suggest that the material between our interpreted base of the resurge layer and top of melt rock is equivalent to these hyaloclastite-like deposits.…”
Section: Processes Associated With Impact Meltmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This material is thought to be formed by MWI and high energy transport of fragmented melt rock (Gulick et al, 2019;Osinski et al, 2020;F. M. Schulte et al, 2021) that bear similarities with hyaloclastite deposits (Kaskes et al, 2021). The impact melt rocks at Site M0077 are too thin to be resolved in FWI velocity models (Figures 5 and 9), but we suggest that the material between our interpreted base of the resurge layer and top of melt rock is equivalent to these hyaloclastite-like deposits.…”
Section: Processes Associated With Impact Meltmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…( B ) Stratigraphy of the impactite sequence between cores 40 and 90 (∼ 616.5–732 m below sea floor [mbsf]) with the degree of core recovery and the initial subdivision of the sequence by Gulick et al (Unit 1G; 2A-2C; 3A). Adjacent, an alternative subdivision of this sequence is shown with the three distinct suevite units suggested by Kaskes et al 12 . The red dashed square indicates the stratigraphic interval in which macroscopic ichnological features are recognized in the suevite clasts.…”
Section: Geological Setting: Sedimentology and Paleoenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Below this suevite sequence, a brecciated impact melt rock is encountered with green bands of sparry calcite (schlieren) and rare carbonate clasts, followed by black impact melt rock containing abundant crystalline basement clasts (Unit 3, Gulick et al 21 ) extending to a depth of 747 mbsf. This impact melt and suevite sequence was formed extremely rapidly within the impact basin in < 1 day post-impact 5 , 12 , 21 , 28 . Unit 4 consists of shocked granitoid basement with pre-impact dikes (including dolerites, dacites and felsites), and intercalations of suevite and impact melt rock 5 , 6 , 21 , 33 .…”
Section: Geological Setting: Sedimentology and Paleoenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suevite occurs at several intervals in the core. The top of the peak ring in Hole M0077A is covered with ∼104 m of suevite with variable clast size and lithology (Kaskes et al., 2021). Clast dimensions range from submillimeter to several centimeters; in general, clast size increases with depth (Gulick et al., 2019; Morgan et al., 2017).…”
Section: Geological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%