2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-1035(03)00076-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of the regular satellites of giant planets in an extended gaseous nebula I: subnebula model and accretion of satellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
180
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
10
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later studies revised this model and tried to explain the difference between the satellite systems of Jupiter and Saturn (Sasaki et al 2010;Ogihara & Ida 2012). On the other hand, the socalled solid enhanced minimum mass disk model proposed by Mosqueira & Estrada (2003) considers a circumplanetary disk consisting of two different parts of surface density in order to explain the rock-ice ratio of the Galilean satellites. Recently, satellite formation based on this model was examined semi-analytically (Miguel & Ida 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later studies revised this model and tried to explain the difference between the satellite systems of Jupiter and Saturn (Sasaki et al 2010;Ogihara & Ida 2012). On the other hand, the socalled solid enhanced minimum mass disk model proposed by Mosqueira & Estrada (2003) considers a circumplanetary disk consisting of two different parts of surface density in order to explain the rock-ice ratio of the Galilean satellites. Recently, satellite formation based on this model was examined semi-analytically (Miguel & Ida 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their bulk densities range from a high of 1.6 g/cm^ for Enceladus (Porco et al, 2006) to perhaps as low as 1.0 g/cm^ for Tethys (Dourneau and Baratchart, 1999), betraying compositions of mostly water ice but with formation histories that led to differing non-ice fractions and interior structure. Compositions are likely related to the positions of their formation from Saturn, especially with regard to the fraction of ammonia (e.g., Mosqueira and Estrada, 2003) which is expected to be prevalent in these satellites due to the cool temperatures in the saturnian nebula (Lewis, 1972). The Cassini mission has recently performed close flybys of these moons, confirming that varying degrees of geologic activity (Wagner et al, 2006) were sustained for an extended period of time on these small objects after their formation, and continuing to the present on Enceladus (Porco et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these studies, particularly Mosqueira & Estrada (2003) and Estrada & Mosqueira (2006), it is therefore quite reasonable to take into account the existence of some si satellites as we did, and to see their evolution during the planetary migration. The second decisive result of Boué & Laskar (2010) is that their satellite must be destabilized after some time, and this is exactly what we have found in this work.…”
Section: The Si Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…An additional interesting problem is the current obliquity of Uranus. Mosqueira & Estrada (2003) and Estrada & Mosqueira (2006), in their model of satellite formation, note that regular satellites of Uranus can be formed within a disk of radius ≈57 R U . We note that this value is in quite close agreement with the distances predicted based on our value of a c as we note in Sect.…”
Section: The Si Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation