2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formic Acid reductant-Sodium Lauryl Sulphate Surfactant enhanced photogalvanic effect of Indigo Carmine dye sensitizer for simultaneous solar energy conversion and storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are relatively higher in comparison to previously reported cells containing single surfactant as DSS, Tartrazine as a photosensitizer and EDTA as reductant for solar energy conversion and storage(0.6163% and 100.0 minutes), Mixed Surfactant (NaLS+CTAB), Methylene blue as a Photosensitizer and Xylose as Reductant (0.4326% and 90.0 minutes), Mixed Surfactant (NaLS+Tween -80), Methylene blue as a Photosensitizer and Xylose as Reductant (0.5313% and 100.0 minutes), Micellar Effect on Photogalvanics: Solar Energy Conversion and Storage-EDTA-Safranine O-TWEEN-80 System(0.1469% and 20.0 minutes)developed by Rathore Jayshree and Lal Mohan (2018), Gangotri KM and Mohan lal (2013), Lal Mohan and Gangotri KM (2012) and Gangotri and Gangotri (2010), respectively. These observed values are (0.7995% and 129.0 minutes) relatively lower in conversion efficiency but higher in storage capacity in comparison to recently reported photogalvanic cells containing formic Acid reductant-Sodium Lauryl Sulphate Surfactant enhanced photogalvanic effect of Indigo Carmine dye sensitizer for simultaneous solar energy conversion and storage (27.79% and 115.0 minutes), Modified and simplified photogalvanic cells: Solar energy harvesting using bromo cresol green dye with different electrodes and cell dimensions (9.02% and 70.0 minutes), developed by Koli et al (2021), and Koli et al (2022), respectively. Therefore, the photogalvanic cell containing tartrazine lauryl glucoside D-fructose system is more efficient than existing cells.…”
Section: Comparison With Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are relatively higher in comparison to previously reported cells containing single surfactant as DSS, Tartrazine as a photosensitizer and EDTA as reductant for solar energy conversion and storage(0.6163% and 100.0 minutes), Mixed Surfactant (NaLS+CTAB), Methylene blue as a Photosensitizer and Xylose as Reductant (0.4326% and 90.0 minutes), Mixed Surfactant (NaLS+Tween -80), Methylene blue as a Photosensitizer and Xylose as Reductant (0.5313% and 100.0 minutes), Micellar Effect on Photogalvanics: Solar Energy Conversion and Storage-EDTA-Safranine O-TWEEN-80 System(0.1469% and 20.0 minutes)developed by Rathore Jayshree and Lal Mohan (2018), Gangotri KM and Mohan lal (2013), Lal Mohan and Gangotri KM (2012) and Gangotri and Gangotri (2010), respectively. These observed values are (0.7995% and 129.0 minutes) relatively lower in conversion efficiency but higher in storage capacity in comparison to recently reported photogalvanic cells containing formic Acid reductant-Sodium Lauryl Sulphate Surfactant enhanced photogalvanic effect of Indigo Carmine dye sensitizer for simultaneous solar energy conversion and storage (27.79% and 115.0 minutes), Modified and simplified photogalvanic cells: Solar energy harvesting using bromo cresol green dye with different electrodes and cell dimensions (9.02% and 70.0 minutes), developed by Koli et al (2021), and Koli et al (2022), respectively. Therefore, the photogalvanic cell containing tartrazine lauryl glucoside D-fructose system is more efficient than existing cells.…”
Section: Comparison With Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A detailed literature survey (2020-2021) about different photogalvanic cell has been used in solar transformation for better results (16)(17)(18) . Different group of scientist (2021) reported formic acid reductant-sodium lauryl sulphate surfactant enhanced photogalvanic effect of Indigo Carmine dye sensitizer for simultaneous solar energy conversion and storage (19) . Koli et al reported modified and simplified (2022) photogalvanic cells: solar energy harvesting using bromo cresol green dye with different electrodes and cell dimensions was also studied for better cell performance (20) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study thus offers an entirely novel and new photogalvanic system with the abruptly enhanced electrical output (potential 900 mV, current 10 000 μA, and power 989 μW) over the already published studies. 4,8,11,12 It is pertinent to mention here that the present research does not introduce any new mechanism for the photo-generation of the current, but a new and novel cell fabrication design with greatly enhanced electrical output. S3), and 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH, M.W.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endeavor to continuously improve and optimize photogalvanic cell by using different dye sensitizers, reductants, and surfactants has been a consistent effort by researchers. Various dye photo‐sensitizers (such as the Bromophenol Red, 3 Congo Red, 4 Azur B, 5 Methylene Blue, 6 Brilliant Cresyl Blue, 7 Rose Bengal, 8 Safranine O, 9,10 Indigo Carmine, 11 Sudan‐I, 12 Rhodamine B, 7 Fast Green FCF, 13 Metanil Yellow, 14 mixed dyes, 15 Eosin, 16 Toluidine blue, 17 etc.) and similarly different reductants (like ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid, 5,6 formic acid, 11 fructose, 12 Fe +2 , 18 sugars, 16 D‐Xylose, 17 etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apichat Phengdaam observed the improvement of organic solar cell performance by multiple plasmonic excitations using mixed silver nanoprisms 29 . Koli et al have reported formic acid reductant‐sodium lauryl sulfate surfactant‐enhanced photogalvanic effect of indigo carmine dye sensitizer for simultaneous solar energy conversion and storage 30 . Chen et al studied flow field simulation and pressure drop modeling by a porous medium in PEM fuel cells 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%