1977
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(77)90067-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulations and solution procedures for nonlinear structural analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-negative second integral in (20) represents the elastic strain energy 6' W e that the structure would receive from the external agency promoting the disturbance in a hypothetical purely elastic regime. It is worth noting that d2 W e is strictly positive for any geometric perturbation not coincident with one generated by a virtual 6p alone.…”
Section: 2 Overall Stability and Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-negative second integral in (20) represents the elastic strain energy 6' W e that the structure would receive from the external agency promoting the disturbance in a hypothetical purely elastic regime. It is worth noting that d2 W e is strictly positive for any geometric perturbation not coincident with one generated by a virtual 6p alone.…”
Section: 2 Overall Stability and Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the effect of increasing the support length a on the peak adhesive stresses and on the peak plate stresses an adhesively bonded T-joint with double support was analysed for different support lengths a of 15,20,25,30,40,60, and 80 mm based on the SSLD theory. The analyses were carried out for each of the boundary conditions shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Support Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, many parameters ignored in the analytical approaches can be taken into account and more realistic solutions can be achieved. Wood and co-workers [14,15], Stricklin and co-workers [16][17][18][19][20], Carey [21], and Bathe and Cimento [22] are among those who have contributed to the development of the FEM including geometrically non-linear effects. More details can be found in Refs [4,23] and [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will cost a great deal of computational e!ort to obtain a long-term solution, especially for a system with many d.o.f. The pseudo-force method [22,23] and the incremental mode superposition technique [24,25] have also been used for non-linear response analysis, but both of them are still step-by-step time-marching scheme. The hybrid frequency}time domain (HFTD) method developed for soil}structure interaction analysis [26,27] has been shown to be an e$cient numerical procedure in solving non-linear transient responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%