1992
DOI: 10.1080/10862969209547793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forty Years of Nrc Publications: 1952–1991

Abstract: This article synthesizes the history and research trends of the National Reading Conference through a global analysis of 2,139 articles published in the Journal of Reading Behavior and the NRC Yearbooks. All articles published in JRB and the Yearbook through 1991 were classified by topic and method of analysis and stored in a permanent database. Systematic searches of the database yielded summary data for topic popularity, authorship trends, and methodological and philosophical shifts within the organization. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the current content analysis took a different approach than previous content analyses (we examined multiple journals for 6 years; previous analyses typically examined only one or just a few journals for many years), it is difficult to draw comparisons and impossible, with our data, to trace trends over time. However, previous content analyses found, like we did, that Comprehension and Instruction were common topics appearing in literacy journals (Baldwin et al, 1992; Dunston et al, 1998; Guzzetti et al, 1999; Morrison et al, 2011). Topics commonly found in other analyses that were less common in ours include Assessment (Morrison et al, 2011; Reutzel & Mohr, 2015), Teachers/Teacher Education (Dunston et al, 1998), and the Reader (Guzzetti et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the current content analysis took a different approach than previous content analyses (we examined multiple journals for 6 years; previous analyses typically examined only one or just a few journals for many years), it is difficult to draw comparisons and impossible, with our data, to trace trends over time. However, previous content analyses found, like we did, that Comprehension and Instruction were common topics appearing in literacy journals (Baldwin et al, 1992; Dunston et al, 1998; Guzzetti et al, 1999; Morrison et al, 2011). Topics commonly found in other analyses that were less common in ours include Assessment (Morrison et al, 2011; Reutzel & Mohr, 2015), Teachers/Teacher Education (Dunston et al, 1998), and the Reader (Guzzetti et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In conducting this analysis, we follow other researchers who have explored trends and issues in literacy research. Past content analyses have often been organization-specific, such as the retrospective analysis of the National Reading Conference’s publications, conducted by Baldwin and colleagues (1992), which summarized 40 years of trends in the Journal of Reading Behavior ( JRB ; now the Journal of Literacy Research , JLR ) and the NRC Yearbook (now Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice ). Baldwin et al found that comprehension was the most widely researched topic, with methodological analysis shifting from a steady stream of ANOVA and correlational research to more qualitative studies.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downloaded by [Simon Fraser University] at 16:18 16 November 2014 Instruments A code sheet and a code book were developed to facilitate analysis. Initially, two researchers drafted the preliminary code sheet and code book using the Baldwin et al (1992) template as a guide. We began with general bibliographic information (i.e., authors, article titles, journal titles, year, volume, issue, page numbers).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once again, Baldwin et al (1992) codes were used as a starting point. In addition, salient codes were pulled from IRA's Standards for Reading Professionals (2010) with an eye on guidelines for how to prepare teachers of literacy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are most often longitudinal analyses of a single journal or a single organization's journals rather than our current approach of studying the content of numerous journals over a period of time. For example, Baldwin et al (1992) completed the first of several content analyses of publications of the National Reading Conference (NRC), now the Literacy Research Association (LRA). Baldwin et al studied the contents of the Journal of Reading Behavior (now JLR) and the NRC Yearbook from their inceptions, in 1969 and 1952, respectively, to 1991.…”
Section: Previous Content Analyses Of Literacy Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%