2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward Error Correction based Encoding Technique for Cross-layer Multi Channel MAC protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFMSS [32] has considered superframe scheduling under the beacon scheduling process but has not considered the coexistence environment. FEC-CMCMAC [33] have considered the superframe scheduling and have recovered the data lost due to the collision but doesn't considered the dynamic environment. FDRX [6] has considered the latency requirements as per the smart grid policies, but ignored the coexistence environment and assumed as there is no effect observed as PSOLACES works, 3% better compared to FEC-CMCMAC, 6% better compared to CMCMAC, almost 15% better when compared to CFMSS, 14% better compared to FDRX and approximately 16% better when compared to RDBS.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CFMSS [32] has considered superframe scheduling under the beacon scheduling process but has not considered the coexistence environment. FEC-CMCMAC [33] have considered the superframe scheduling and have recovered the data lost due to the collision but doesn't considered the dynamic environment. FDRX [6] has considered the latency requirements as per the smart grid policies, but ignored the coexistence environment and assumed as there is no effect observed as PSOLACES works, 3% better compared to FEC-CMCMAC, 6% better compared to CMCMAC, almost 15% better when compared to CFMSS, 14% better compared to FDRX and approximately 16% better when compared to RDBS.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAC layer triggers the channel shifting process, in selecting a better channel with minimum interference. In [33] the forward error correction was proposed as an addition to CMCMAC above so as to recover the collided data (partially lost) due to collision. Though it detects the interference proactively, the channel switching process is not proactive and hence consumes significant amount of delay.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a three‐step process is executed in CMCMAC protocol. Existing interference approximation is performed. Future interference is projected based on Hidden Markov Model (HMM). Channel with minimum interference is allotted for Zigbee transmission 36 The Energy Efficient Cross‐layer Protocol (EECP) endeavors the data that have been produced by means of the neighboring layers such as physical layer, MAC layer, and the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the work carried will guarantee the delay experienced by ZigBee while maintaining the data rate of WLAN. The cross-layer multichannel MAC protocol was introduced in [29] for interference avoidance between WiFi and ZigBee operating in the 2.4GHz frequency band. Based on the present state interference calculation, the forthcoming interference is estimated based on hidden Markov model and based on the estimation the channel with low interference is assigned.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has considered the load scheduling effectively but have not considered the Channel utilization parameter. The CMCMAC-FEC [29] was proposed for coexisting mechanism environment and have considered efficient packet delivery towards receiver side and also arrangement was there for finding the low interference effected channel. But could not assess the channel utilization effectively.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%