We study crystal nucleation of the Weeks-Chandler-Andersen (WCA) model, using the recently introduced Persistent Embryo Method (PEM). The method provides detailed characterization of pre-critical, critical and post-critical nuclei, as well as nucleation rates that compare favorably with those obtained using other methods (umbrella sampling, forward flux sampling or seeding). We further map our results to a hard sphere model allowing to compare with other existing predictions. Implications for experiments are also discussed.* Email: yangsun@ameslab.gov (Y.S.) or fzhang@ameslab.gov (F.Z.) 11 . Experimental nucleation rates, however, remain in significant disagreement with most existing theoretical predictions using these simple models 4,12 .Recently, we have introduced the Persistent Embryo Method (PEM) 13 and applied it to the investigation of the nucleation of pure Ni and binary CuZr by all atom MD simulations. In this paper, we demonstrate that PEM is an efficient method by applying it to the Weeks-Chandler-Andersen (WCA) model 14 , assuming the validity of CNT. As we describe further below, PEM can measure the nucleation rate in the low-density regime and does not make any geometrical assumption on the shape of nucleus. Moreover, PEM can obtain the unbiased configuration of the critical nucleus. We expect that PEM will become the method of choice as the optimal implementation of CNT for certain problems. Furthermore, given the current disagreements between nucleation rates as measured in experiments or calculated by theory, new techniques are crucial, in that they provide additional insights on the origins of such discrepancies. This paper is organized as follows: in Sec. 2 we present the WCA model, including the description of Brownian dynamics and order parameter. In Sec. 3 we show the method and discuss the calculation of other necessary quantities, such as the chemical potential. Sec. 4 describes the persistent-embryo method (PEM) and Sec. 5 describes the determination of attachment rate. In Sec. 6, we derive the rate equation and present our predictions. In Sec. 7, we discuss our results and compare them with existing estimates obtained by other methods. A comparison with experimental results is also included. The conclusions are left for Sec. 8.
WCA model and simulation details