2012
DOI: 10.1080/17442508.2012.694438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward indifference valuation of American options

Abstract: We analyse the valuation of American options under the forward performance criterion introduced by Musiela and Zariphopoulou [Quant. Finance 9 (2008), pp. 161-170]. In this framework, the performance criterion evolves forward in time without reference to a specific future time horizon, and may depend on the stochastic market conditions. We examine two applications: the valuation of American options with stochastic volatility and the modelling of early exercises of American-style employee stock options. We work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we were to allow the agents to trade other securities, one could envisage adding risk aversion by considering utility-based valuation and hedging, yielding combined optimal stopping and control problems. Such ESO problems have been considered for constant drift models by Leung and Sircar [35,36] and Grasselli and Henderson [27] using classical utility, and by Leung, Sircar and Zariphopoulou [37] using forward utility. These works take the required regularity of value functions as given.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we were to allow the agents to trade other securities, one could envisage adding risk aversion by considering utility-based valuation and hedging, yielding combined optimal stopping and control problems. Such ESO problems have been considered for constant drift models by Leung and Sircar [35,36] and Grasselli and Henderson [27] using classical utility, and by Leung, Sircar and Zariphopoulou [37] using forward utility. These works take the required regularity of value functions as given.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this paper is to study optimal investment evaluated by a forward performance criterion in a stochastic factor market model, in which the probability measure that models future stock price evolutions is ambiguous. The forward performance process, as an adapted stochastic dynamic utility evolving forward in time, has been introduced and developed in [41]- [45] (see also [24] and [55], and more recently [2], [3], [6], [12], [23], [28], [33], [37], [39] and [51]). This new concept differs from the classical expected utility function, in which the objective is to solve a stochastic control problem in a backward way via dynamic programming principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this paper is to study optimal investment evaluated by a forward performance criterion in a stochastic factor market model, in which the probability measure that models future stock price evolutions is ambiguous. The forward performance process, as an adapted stochastic utility function with respect to wealth and evolving forward in time, has been introduced and developed in [31]- [35] (see also [19], [29], and [44] and more recently [1], [18], and [23]). This new concept differs from the classical expected utility function, in which the problem is to solve a stochastic control problem in a backward way via dynamic programming principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%