2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward modeling magnetic fields of induced and remanent magnetization in the lithosphere using tesseroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We solve the 3D heat conduction problem and determine the density in the mantle self-consistently based on temperature, pressure, and bulk composition. Here, we couple, via Curie temperature depth, the thermal output from LitMod with a spherical magnetic modeling software (Baykiev et al, 2016) in order to compute synthetic crustal magnetic anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We solve the 3D heat conduction problem and determine the density in the mantle self-consistently based on temperature, pressure, and bulk composition. Here, we couple, via Curie temperature depth, the thermal output from LitMod with a spherical magnetic modeling software (Baykiev et al, 2016) in order to compute synthetic crustal magnetic anomalies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a modeling area of the considered size, magnetic anomalies need to be calculated within a spherical approach to account for possible edge and far-field effects (Baykiev et al, 2016). Here, we adopt an approach based on spherical prisms (tesseroids), with each having an uniform magnetization and susceptibility, to determine lithospheric magnetic anomalies (magnetic tesseroids software, Baykiev et al, 2016 IGRF12 model with datum 2016-01-01 is used here as the inducing field to set magnetization vectors in each tesseroid across the model. The susceptibility distribution in our crustal model is derived from the VIS model of Hemant (2003) dividing by the thickness between the top and bottom magnetic boundaries in our model.…”
Section: Magnetic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, modelling of aeromagnetic surveys requires a better representation of the source bodies and, therefore, often Cartesian or Fourier-based approaches are used [21]. A representation with magnetic tesseroids [22] provides a versatile discretization that can be used for modelling both satellite and airborne data. The forward modelling code of Reference [22] allows the calculation of the magnetic field in spherical coordinates using spherical prisms, which are also called tesseroids (magnetic sources).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%