2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward modeling of total magnetic anomaly over a pseudo-2D underground ferromagnetic pipeline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13. As the figure indicates, peakepeak values detected from the same distance are not the same for the three types of casing pipe (Guo et al, 2015). Larger peakepeak value was detected for casing pipe with larger diameter from the same distance, indicating that casing pipe which is wider and thicker is more likely to be detected from a farther distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…13. As the figure indicates, peakepeak values detected from the same distance are not the same for the three types of casing pipe (Guo et al, 2015). Larger peakepeak value was detected for casing pipe with larger diameter from the same distance, indicating that casing pipe which is wider and thicker is more likely to be detected from a farther distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, in the dual horizontal well model, the casing cannot be regarded as a magnetic dipole in the computation due to its nonnegligible length compared with its distance from the measuring point (4-10 m). Pignatelli et al [22] and Guo et al [23][24][25] propose that the pipeline can be segmented into small units and reconstructed thereby. The magnetic field of each segmentation unit can be calculated using the magnetic dipole method [22][23][24].…”
Section: Magnetic Rangingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pignatelli et al [22] and Guo et al [23][24][25] propose that the pipeline can be segmented into small units and reconstructed thereby. The magnetic field of each segmentation unit can be calculated using the magnetic dipole method [22][23][24]. By performing vector superposition of the magnetic fields of all the segmentation units, the overall magnetization field of the pipeline at the measurement point can be figured out.…”
Section: Magnetic Rangingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underground metal detection technology has been widely used in military fields [1] and also plays an important role in archeology [2], prospecting [3], medical positioning [4], underground metal pipeline modeling [5] and other fields. Electromagnetic induction (EMI) detection technology is an underground metal detection method that uses secondary field information generated by a changing magnetic field acting on the metal target to detect the state of a target [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%