Technology Guide 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88546-7_62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossil energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain levels of NO x and SO 2 are reported for two of the double flashing cases but these species are reported to be completely removed using the Air Products sour compression process. The distillation case from the COORAL project (Kather and Kownatzki, 2011;Kather et al, 2013) reports very high purity CO 2 at 99.94 % v/v; however, the CO 2 purity of the distillation case reported by Pipitone and Bolland (2009) is lower at 99.3 % v/v.…”
Section: Oxy-fuel Co 2 Impurities From Pulverised Coalmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Certain levels of NO x and SO 2 are reported for two of the double flashing cases but these species are reported to be completely removed using the Air Products sour compression process. The distillation case from the COORAL project (Kather and Kownatzki, 2011;Kather et al, 2013) reports very high purity CO 2 at 99.94 % v/v; however, the CO 2 purity of the distillation case reported by Pipitone and Bolland (2009) is lower at 99.3 % v/v.…”
Section: Oxy-fuel Co 2 Impurities From Pulverised Coalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Data used to compile the table are taken from the COORAL project (Kather and Kownatzki, 2011;Kather et al, 2013), a collaborative industrial paper (Wilkinson et al, 2001), a study from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NUST) by Pipitone and Bolland (2009), an IEA report (Dillon et al, 2005), a paper written by Air Products (White et al, 2009) and a report on the Callide oxyfuel demonstration project (Spero et al, 2014). Table 3 shows the raw/dehumidified CO 2 has a purity in the range of 74.8 -85 %, with the main impurities being O 2 , N 2 and Ar which arise from excess oxidant and air ingress.…”
Section: Oxy-fuel Co 2 Impurities From Pulverised Coalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the applied capture technology, there are different types and amounts of impurities in the captured CO 2 streams. Literature data collated in [23] was used to define CO 2 stream compositions of the different plants and capture facilities (Table 2). The compositions of all CO 2 streams captured with the same capture technology were assumed to be equal, with the exception of cement plants: As the used fuel does not contain sulfur, there is also no SO x in the generated CO 2 stream.…”
Section: Composition Of Co 2 Streams Captured At the Individual Co 2 Emittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, there is a proportionally greater proportion of the remaining impurities listed for the other post-combustion capture (PCC) plants (data not included in Table 2). The H 2 O concentration of captured CO 2 streams was limited to 50 ppm v in the scenarios following [23,24]. Each emitter's CO 2 stream composition was assumed to be constant over time.…”
Section: Composition Of Co 2 Streams Captured At the Individual Co 2 Emittersmentioning
confidence: 99%