2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fouling modeling and prediction approach for heat exchangers using deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[50]- [52], implantable biomedical devices [4], [53], etc., and for concurrent temperature and fouling measurements in industrial pipelines [34], especially in low-temperature heat exchangers [54]- [56] to ensure profitable heat recovery. Overall, new or existing magnetostrictive sensor packages can be suitably adapted to measure temperatures remotely, using either the TCF-or TCVbased technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[50]- [52], implantable biomedical devices [4], [53], etc., and for concurrent temperature and fouling measurements in industrial pipelines [34], especially in low-temperature heat exchangers [54]- [56] to ensure profitable heat recovery. Overall, new or existing magnetostrictive sensor packages can be suitably adapted to measure temperatures remotely, using either the TCF-or TCVbased technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikoo et al [27] used extended Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek (DLVO) theory to predict the CaSO 4 fouling propensity and compared the results obtained from this technique with experimental data in their investigation, and found 75% of all data consistent with the proposed fouling propensity indicator (FPI) criterion. Sundar et al [28] developed a generalized and scalable model for accurately predicting fouling resistance based on deep learning for cross-flow heat exchangers. The heat exchangers' fouling and heat transfer physics have been demonstrated through a neural network framework.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHM-XAI works associated with anomaly detection and failure prognostic are summarized. In the order of presentation: (i) interpretable model [40,41]; (ii) extraction-based approach [42]; (iii) decision rules and knowledge-based explanation [43]; (iv) attention mechanism [44]; (v) model agnostic [45]; and (vi) visual explanation technique [46].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%