2013
DOI: 10.1127/0029-5035/2013/0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four new species of Hyphodontia (Xylodon ss. Hjortstam & Ryvarden, Basidiomycota) from Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lyomyces macrosporus was sister to L. allantosporus, but morphologically L. allantosporus differs in having porulose hymenophore and suballantoid to allantoid, narrower basidiospores (7-9 × 3-3.8 µm, Yurchenko et al 2017). Lyomyces wuliangshanensis grouped closely with L. mascarensis, but L. mascarensis differs from L. wuliangshanensis by having thin-walled generative hyphae and presence of capitate cystidia (17-38 × 3.5-6 µm, Yurchenko et al 2017 ; L. capitatocystidiatus by grandinioid hymenophore with arachnoid-farinaceous hymenial surface (Xiong et al 2009); L. microfasciculatus by minutely odontioid hymenial surface and small emerging fascicles of flexuous hyphae (Yurchenko and Wu 2014); L. tenuissimus by much thinner basidiomata and non-encrusted, subicular hyphae, shorter cystidia and shorter basidia (Yurchenko et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lyomyces macrosporus was sister to L. allantosporus, but morphologically L. allantosporus differs in having porulose hymenophore and suballantoid to allantoid, narrower basidiospores (7-9 × 3-3.8 µm, Yurchenko et al 2017). Lyomyces wuliangshanensis grouped closely with L. mascarensis, but L. mascarensis differs from L. wuliangshanensis by having thin-walled generative hyphae and presence of capitate cystidia (17-38 × 3.5-6 µm, Yurchenko et al 2017 ; L. capitatocystidiatus by grandinioid hymenophore with arachnoid-farinaceous hymenial surface (Xiong et al 2009); L. microfasciculatus by minutely odontioid hymenial surface and small emerging fascicles of flexuous hyphae (Yurchenko and Wu 2014); L. tenuissimus by much thinner basidiomata and non-encrusted, subicular hyphae, shorter cystidia and shorter basidia (Yurchenko et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The members of Lyomyces grow on dead, still-attached or fallen branches of angiosperms, on dead wooden and herbaceous stems, or occasionally on gymnosperm wood (Yurchenko et al 2017). Twentythree species are currently known in Lyomyces worldwide (Rabenhorst 1851;Karsten 1881Karsten , 1882Peck 1903;Bourdot and Galzin 1911;Cunningham 1959Cunningham , 1963Wu 1990;Hjortstam and Ryvarden 2009;Yurchenko et al 2013Yurchenko et al , 2017Gafforov et al 2017;Riebesehl and Langer 2017) and five species were recorded in China (Xiong et al 2009;Gafforov et al 2017;Riebesehl and Langer 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Langer 1994, p. 143 for illustration) and Nepal (Hjortstam and Ryvarden 1984) were originally identified as X.lanatus . Hyphae and spores of this species were also depicted by Yurchenko et al (2013) under the name X.lanatus . These two species and other morphologically similar taxa are compared in the Discussion section below; a key is also presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We retain the same diagnostic features, noted in the protologue (basidiomata with well-developed woolly subiculum, terminal vesicular structures on subicular hyphae, poorly differentiated subhymenium, encrusted thick-walled hyphae in tooth apices and capitate cystidia) and add that walls of basidia and subhymenial hyphae directly under hymenial elements are slightly but distinctly thickened. The illustration of Xylodonlanatus from Taiwan, provided by Wu (1990), also shows basidia with walls thickened below, but hyphal pegs appear different from X.lanatus s.s. We have also determined that X.echinatus (Yurchenko et al 2013) is the most morphologically similar species to X.lanatus s.s. A key to the taxa in the X.lanatus group is presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Riebesehl & Langer based on the character of the thick-walled basidiospores. However, Xylodon anmashanensis is distinguished from X. gossypinus by having the irpicoid to odontioid hymenial surface and longer basidiospores (up to 7.5 µm long) [13]; X. crassisporus differs from X. gossypinus by having only one type of capitate cystidia and wider basidiospores (5.5-6 × 4-4.5 µm) [53]; X. pruinosus differs from X. gossypinus by its grandinioid to odontoid hymenial surface and the presence of clavate to spathuliform cystidia [26]; X. rickii is separated from X. gossypinus by having the ochraceous hymenial surface with small brown dots and the presence of two types of cystidia: encrusted cystidia and capitate cystidia [54]; X. septocystidiatus is distinguished from X. gossypinus by its grandinioid hymenial surface and the presence of septocystidia [23].…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%