1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)36537-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four ribose 2'-hydroxyl groups essential for catalytic function of the hairpin ribozyme.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, TNA has a five-atom backbone repeat unit with a four-carbon sugar that is connected by 2′,3′-phosphodiester linkages. Thus, from a purely chemical perspective, these differences are more substantial than the chemical differences separating RNA from DNA, which are incapable of undergoing transliteration even though they differ by a single 2′-hydroxyl group ( 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparison, TNA has a five-atom backbone repeat unit with a four-carbon sugar that is connected by 2′,3′-phosphodiester linkages. Thus, from a purely chemical perspective, these differences are more substantial than the chemical differences separating RNA from DNA, which are incapable of undergoing transliteration even though they differ by a single 2′-hydroxyl group ( 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which different classes of nucleic acid molecules share overlapping peaks in the fitness landscape is an interesting, but largely unexplored question in molecular evolution. Classical biochemistry studies clearly show that the catalytic properties of ribozymes are not retained when the RNA sequence is prepared as DNA ( 8 , 9 ). This observation, which reflects differences in the sugar pucker and backbone inclination angle between DNA and RNA ( 10 , 11 ), led to the unwritten rule that functional activity cannot be transferred between different classes of nucleic acid molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important contacts between the Tetrahymena ribozyme core and 2′-hydroxyls of both strands of the P1 helix have been identified from the loss in binding energy that results from specific deoxynucleotide substitutions (39)(40)(41)(42). Specific deoxynucleotide substitutions in loop B and the ribozyme strand of loop A also have been found to impair hairpin ribozyme cleavage activity (43,44), leading to the proposal that a "ribose zipper" motif (18) mediates docking between loops A and B (15). Functional assays developed in the current study combined with time-resolved FRET measurements of docking equilibria provide a way to evaluate energetic contributions of specific functional groups to tertiary interactions within and between hairpin ribozyme structural elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the crystal structure of a group 1 ribozyme domain shows examples of functional group coordination involving both the N 3 and 2′-hydroxyl groups of adenosine (24). Since the 2′-hydroxyl of A 10 was shown to be essential for catalytic function (25), coordination involving both the N 3 and 2′-OH groups at this position cannot be ruled out as a structural motif.…”
Section: Loop 1 Ribozyme Positions a 7 -A 10mentioning
confidence: 99%