“…In view of these results and Lagrange's theorem of four squares, it is reasonable to conjecture that every large even integer n ≡ 4 (mod 24) is a sum of four squares of primes n = p In [4], Liu and Liu showed that k = 8330 is acceptable in (1.2). Recently, Liu and Lü [7] improved this result and proved that k = 165 suffices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is Proposition 4.3 in [6] except for the value of c 3 . It has been shown in [6] that By the proof of Lemma 5.2 in [7] we have…”
Section: Proof Following the Argument Of Lemma 61 In [4] We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the argument of [7], suppose first N ≡ 4 (mod 8), let E λ be defined in (2.8), and M and m as in (2.5) with P, Q determined in (2.1). Then (2.2) becomes…”
Section: 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Proposition 3 in [2], we know that the conclusion of Lemma 3.1 of [7] holds for D = N 1/16−2ε . By the argument in Section 3 of [7], in the proof of Lemma 2.2 of [7], we can fix z = N 1/32−ε , and then we can get c 1 ≤ (1+ε) 6 ·101·32 4 in Lemma 2.2 of [7]. Following the argument of the proof of Lemma 4.1 of [7], by Lemma 4 we get the assertion of Lemma 3.…”
“…In view of these results and Lagrange's theorem of four squares, it is reasonable to conjecture that every large even integer n ≡ 4 (mod 24) is a sum of four squares of primes n = p In [4], Liu and Liu showed that k = 8330 is acceptable in (1.2). Recently, Liu and Lü [7] improved this result and proved that k = 165 suffices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is Proposition 4.3 in [6] except for the value of c 3 . It has been shown in [6] that By the proof of Lemma 5.2 in [7] we have…”
Section: Proof Following the Argument Of Lemma 61 In [4] We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the argument of [7], suppose first N ≡ 4 (mod 8), let E λ be defined in (2.8), and M and m as in (2.5) with P, Q determined in (2.1). Then (2.2) becomes…”
Section: 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Proposition 3 in [2], we know that the conclusion of Lemma 3.1 of [7] holds for D = N 1/16−2ε . By the argument in Section 3 of [7], in the proof of Lemma 2.2 of [7], we can fix z = N 1/32−ε , and then we can get c 1 ≤ (1+ε) 6 ·101·32 4 in Lemma 2.2 of [7]. Following the argument of the proof of Lemma 4.1 of [7], by Lemma 4 we get the assertion of Lemma 3.…”
“…Later Liu and Lü [7] improved the value of k of (1.2) to 165, Li [3] improved it to 151 and Zhao [13] improved it to 46. Finally Platt and Trudgian [11] revised it to 45.…”
Abstract:In this paper, we obtained that when k = , every pair of large even integers satisfying some necessary conditions can be represented in the form of a pair of unlike powers of primes and k powers of .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.