2005
DOI: 10.1090/surv/116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fourier Analysis in Convex Geometry

Abstract: Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy a chapter for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
434
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(440 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
434
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, we may consider subspaces E ⊂ R n for which (Proj E ) * µ is ε-radial, and expect that the restriction of · to these subspaces is close, in a certain sense, to the Euclidean norm. See Koldobsky [19,Chapter 6] for a comprehensive discussion of norms admitting representations in the spirit of (46). While this approach may possibly yield some meaningful estimates for some classes of normed spaces, it has limitations.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, we may consider subspaces E ⊂ R n for which (Proj E ) * µ is ε-radial, and expect that the restriction of · to these subspaces is close, in a certain sense, to the Euclidean norm. See Koldobsky [19,Chapter 6] for a comprehensive discussion of norms admitting representations in the spirit of (46). While this approach may possibly yield some meaningful estimates for some classes of normed spaces, it has limitations.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for Banach spaces such as N ∞ , a random subspace is not sufficiently close to a Hilbert space (see Schechtman [28]), and there are better choices than the random one. (Indeed, the N ∞ norm cannot be represented as in (46) or in a similar way, see Theorem 6.13 in Koldobsky [19], due to Misiewicz.) A direct application of Theorem 1.3 is thus quite unlikely to provide new information regarding approximately Hilbertian subspaces for all finite-dimensional normed spaces.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projection bodies and their polars have received considerable attention over the past few decades (see [3,5,7,8,10,14,15,16,22,25,26,29,32,33,34,35]). Important volume inequalities for the polars of projection bodies are the Petty projection inequality [23] and the Zhang projection inequality [31]: Among bodies of given volume the polar projection bodies have maximal volume precisely for ellipsoids and minimal volume precisely for simplices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding (1.1), extensive information, including generalizations and applications, can be found in [16,26,36,47,48,49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%