2020
DOI: 10.1090/tran/8283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fourier decay of fractal measures on hyperboloids

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, d − 1 (their notation) = n (ours); see also Theorem 2 and Proposition 2.1 of [3]. When D 2 P is positive definite, we can complement Corollary 1.3 with Du and Zhang's deep result in Theorem 2.4 of [18], so that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, d − 1 (their notation) = n (ours); see also Theorem 2 and Proposition 2.1 of [3]. When D 2 P is positive definite, we can complement Corollary 1.3 with Du and Zhang's deep result in Theorem 2.4 of [18], so that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…where we assume that 1 ≤ m ≤ n/2 without loss of generality. These symbols were also extensively studied in [3], where several positive and negative results were established. By (2), we only need to work with α > n/2.…”
Section: (Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I am not aware of such results. However, in addition to the spherical averages (discussed in Section 4), which have been studied for a long time, there are recent estimates for cones and hyperboloids; see [2], [13], and [1].…”
Section: Product Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L : R n−1 → R n−1 is an invertible, self-adjoint linear mapping of signature σ . This prototypical case is essentially treated in [2] (see also [11]) but, for completeness, the details are given.…”
Section: Constant Coefficient Decoupling: Quadratic Casementioning
confidence: 99%