1996
DOI: 10.1006/gmip.1996.0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal Modeling of Natural Terrain: Analysis and Surface Reconstruction with Range Data

Abstract: In this paper we address two issues in modeling natural terrain using fractal geometry: estimation of fractal dimension, and fractal surface reconstruction. For estimation of fractal dimension, we extend the fractal Brownian function approach to accommodate irregularly sampled data, and we develop methods for segmenting sets of points exhibiting self-similarity over only certain scales. For fractal surface reconstruction, we extend Szeliski's regularization with fractal priors method to use a temperature param… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary intention of using such a numerically-constructed rough surface is to demonstrate the ability of the developed preprocessing algorithm to design a relevant boundary condition (in 3-D), for the simulation of fracture cementation process. In past years, efficient algorithms have been developed to generate realistic surfaces (Lewis (1987); Arakawa and Krotkov (1996)). However, a detailed comparison of such algorithms merit a separate discussion which in all certainties, is neither the focus nor the highlight of the present work.…”
Section: Numerical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary intention of using such a numerically-constructed rough surface is to demonstrate the ability of the developed preprocessing algorithm to design a relevant boundary condition (in 3-D), for the simulation of fracture cementation process. In past years, efficient algorithms have been developed to generate realistic surfaces (Lewis (1987); Arakawa and Krotkov (1996)). However, a detailed comparison of such algorithms merit a separate discussion which in all certainties, is neither the focus nor the highlight of the present work.…”
Section: Numerical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For terrain synthesis, Arakawa and Krotkov [5] worked on surface reconstruction with range data; range data refers to natural terrain patterns acquired by a laser rangefinder. They initially estimated the fractal dimension of natural surfaces given range data and then reconstructed natural surfaces using this estimate and the given sparse range data.…”
Section: Image-based Terrain Synthesis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to self-similar models, as discussed here, there are methods that allow us to find the H parameter from a natural terrain [16]. With the calculation of the grounding resistance of a specific electrode from a flat soil surface, the actual resistance to be measured in the real terrain with a given maximum unevenness will have a confidence interval given by Equation (12) when the non-flat soil surface is considered as the only source of variability for the grounding resistance.…”
Section: Stochastic Model For the Grounding Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%