2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional Creatinine Clearance of the Donated Kidney Using Cockcroft-Gault Formula as a Predictor of Graft Function After Living Donor Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between postoperative renal function and parameters such as BMIR, BSAR, WR, and GRWR-act have previously been discussed as indicators of donor-recipient size mismatch ( 12 16 ). Several reports have demonstrated some degree of correlation, but none of these indices sufficiently reflect the quantity of the “nephron mass.” Although GRWR-act might be a closer indicator than other parameters, it does not always reflect the “nephron mass” because it includes the weight of perirenal fatty tissue, renal portal vessels, and the ureter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation between postoperative renal function and parameters such as BMIR, BSAR, WR, and GRWR-act have previously been discussed as indicators of donor-recipient size mismatch ( 12 16 ). Several reports have demonstrated some degree of correlation, but none of these indices sufficiently reflect the quantity of the “nephron mass.” Although GRWR-act might be a closer indicator than other parameters, it does not always reflect the “nephron mass” because it includes the weight of perirenal fatty tissue, renal portal vessels, and the ureter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The donor-recipient size mismatch is manifested by the clearance capacity of the “nephron mass” in the donor graft, which is less than the recipient’s metabolite production. Because the “nephron mass” cannot be directly measured, alternative parameters that can be used as indicators of donor-recipient size mismatch include the donor to recipient weight ratio (WR), body mass index (BMI) ratio (BMIR), body surface area (BSA) index ratio (BSAR), actual graft weight (Graft-act) to recipient weight ratio (GRWR-act), and Graft-act to recipient BSA ratio, and the relationship between these parameters and posttransplantation renal function has been discussed in the previous literature ( 12 16 ). On the other hand, with the recent developments in medical technology, the “nephron mass” can be measured directly by quantifying the renal cortex using 3-dimensional (3D) CT-volumetry based on contrast-enhanced images obtained by multidetector raw CT (MDCT) ( 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, creatinine generation is also determined by the age, sex, weight and nutritional/ catabolic state of the patient. Creatinine clearance was used to estimate kidney function as a metric for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as early as the 1930's [23,24] and is still widely used now to estimate GFR using a number of formulae such as Cockroft-Gault, Nankivell and MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study) [25][26][27] designed to account for the factors noted above that affect creatinine generation and elimination. The obvious irony for kidney transplantation is that creatinine is still another surrogate biomarker for kidney function yet we are using it as the primary biomarker with which to manage complex immunosuppression regimes.…”
Section: Brief History Of Biomarkers-discovery and Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%