2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture behaviour of damaged wood beams repaired with an adhesively-bonded composite patch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The softening regions of the CZM laws are defined in Abaqus s by specification of the damage variable (dn for tension or ds for shear), as a function of dn-dn elastic behaviour up to tn (tension) or ts (shear) and subsequent stiffness reduction, related to the progressive material degradation up to final failure [37,38]. In this work the triangular, linearexponential and trapezoidal shapes were evaluated (Fig.…”
Section: Czm Implementation In the Fe Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The softening regions of the CZM laws are defined in Abaqus s by specification of the damage variable (dn for tension or ds for shear), as a function of dn-dn elastic behaviour up to tn (tension) or ts (shear) and subsequent stiffness reduction, related to the progressive material degradation up to final failure [37,38]. In this work the triangular, linearexponential and trapezoidal shapes were evaluated (Fig.…”
Section: Czm Implementation In the Fe Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint was meshed by ABA-QUS® CAE meshing algorithms from the user introduced seeding preferences (including bias effects). The mesh was particularly refined at the overlap edges to accurately capture spots of stress concentrations [30,31]. The joints were modelled as two-dimensional, with plane strain solid elements (referenced as CPE8 from the ABAQUS® library).…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the prediction was performed by theoretical studies as those of Volkersen [6], which had a lot of embedded simplifying assumptions, by T R.D.S.G. Campilho et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 31 (2015) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS. 31.01 comparing current stresses with the allowable material strengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%