2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture non-union: Can biomarkers predict outcome?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
57
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar picture is described by authors who reviewed the role and potential of biochemical serum markers as indicators of fracture healing disturbances [33, 34, 36, 50, 51]. In theory, the above molecules could reflect a poor response to the regenerative treatment, but this cannot be ascertained in our study because of the lack of failed cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A similar picture is described by authors who reviewed the role and potential of biochemical serum markers as indicators of fracture healing disturbances [33, 34, 36, 50, 51]. In theory, the above molecules could reflect a poor response to the regenerative treatment, but this cannot be ascertained in our study because of the lack of failed cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This impaired fracture healing phenomenon has been attributed to a number of factors, including poor mechanical stability, extensive soft tissue and periosteal disruption, patient related co-morbidities, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, vitamin D deficiency and malnutrition amongst others [102,103]. Current research to understand better and to treat successfully fracture non-union is focusing on biological based approaches and involves the implantation of growth factors, osteoprogenitor cells, biophysical stimuli, and the promotion of local angiogenesis [104].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone fracture is one of the top clinical challenges worldwide.On average, more than 20 billion dollars are spent to treat 7.9 million bone fracture patients in the United States every year (Dahabreh et al, ; Victoria et al, ; Antonova et al, ). The life quality of patients with delayed and non‐union healings is reduced due to a prolonged period of pain, disability, and repetitive operative interventions (Pountos et al, ). Laser capture microdissection (LCM) showed that the expression of DC‐STAMP was decreased in osteoclasts from diabetic mice whose bone healing is delayed (Kasahara et al, ).…”
Section: Possible Involvement Of Dc‐stamp In Biological Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%