Handbook of Adhesive Technology, Revised and Expanded 2003
DOI: 10.1201/9780203912225.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture of Adhesive-Bonded Wood Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rupture and elastic properties are reported to be more a property of the wood rather than the adhesive bond (Frihart 2005). The scarf portions of the joint help in minimising wood material discontinuities (River 2003). This is expected to help the mechanical properties of the jointed sections to be not dependent on the adhesive used to very great extents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rupture and elastic properties are reported to be more a property of the wood rather than the adhesive bond (Frihart 2005). The scarf portions of the joint help in minimising wood material discontinuities (River 2003). This is expected to help the mechanical properties of the jointed sections to be not dependent on the adhesive used to very great extents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][29][30][31], the novelty of its use for conservation and the variations used in the present work demand that a fuller explanation of the technique is provided.…”
Section: Mode I Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PUR, in contrast to PRF or solid wood, shows a ductile behavior under tensile load with a distinctive plastic deformability (Kläusler et al 2013). This characteristic allows for a better stress distribution along the glue joint and hence leads to a lower stress concentration at the crack tip (River 2003;Smith et al 2003;Müller et al 2005). The reduced stress concentration in the bond line also diminishes the n, number of specimens; a 0 , initial crack length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%