2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture of the Atrophic Mandible: Case Series and Critical Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 Some studies report many complications related with the use of reconstruction plates, seldom requiring osteosynthesis material removal. 16 Moreover, some authors describe a higher rate of wound dehiscence due to fixation with large plates. 17 These two items have not been observed as a major concern in our series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Some studies report many complications related with the use of reconstruction plates, seldom requiring osteosynthesis material removal. 16 Moreover, some authors describe a higher rate of wound dehiscence due to fixation with large plates. 17 These two items have not been observed as a major concern in our series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common etiology of mandibular fractures in elderly people was a fall in several studies in the literature (Nishiike et al, 2002;Brucoli et al, 2019;Melo et al, 2011), as well as how occurred with the patient of this case. Studies indicate that with adequate preparation and management, open surgical techniques regain function and bring immediate benefits to patients (Marciani, 2001;Wittwer et al, 2006;Melo et al, 2011). Brucoli et al (2019) conducted a study in which the average age of patients who had an atrophic mandible fracture was 75 years old.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The open reduction of the fractures and the internal fixation are considered the gold standard of treatment and the most predictable method of managing atrophic mandibular fractures due to the benefits of recovering function immediately (Wittwer et al, 2006;Melo et al, 2011). Usually this type of fracture is fixed with a 2.4 system plate that exhibits an adequate mechanic resistance due to its thickness, this fact requires more time during the modeling process (Mardones, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfactory results have been reported with use of reconstructive plates or multiple miniplates placed at various locations. 25,31,32 Ellis and Price recommend the use of a 2.0-mm locking plate, placed using an extraoral subperiosteal approach with immediate supplemental autogenous bone grafting, citing the advantage of thinner plates with lower likelihood for external palpation, plate exposure, or interference with denture placement. They also report facile adaptability of a thinner plate in comparison to the thicker 2.4 mm reconstruction plate.…”
Section: Management Of the Atrophic Edentulous Mandiblementioning
confidence: 99%