2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13030562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Oral Implants In Vitro: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Various protocols are available to preclinically assess the fracture resistance of zirconia oral implants. The objective of the present review was to determine the impact of different treatments (dynamic loading, hydrothermal aging) and implant features (e.g., material, design or manufacturing) on the fracture resistance of zirconia implants. An electronic screening of two databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase) was performed. Investigations including > 5 screw-shaped implants providing information to calculate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
75
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Implant design (1-piece versus 2-piece) and bulk material (Y-TZP versus zirconia composites) showed to have an influence on their mechanical behavior. Regarding implant stability in preclinical situations, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Bethke et al [20] summarized the results of different investigations. A mean bending moment at fracture of approximately 390 Ncm was calculated in that study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant design (1-piece versus 2-piece) and bulk material (Y-TZP versus zirconia composites) showed to have an influence on their mechanical behavior. Regarding implant stability in preclinical situations, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Bethke et al [20] summarized the results of different investigations. A mean bending moment at fracture of approximately 390 Ncm was calculated in that study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zirconia is a perfect material for implants since it has superior mechanical and chemical properties and biocompatibility with less inflammatory response than other metals such as titanium. Single-piece implants were applied due to fewer biological and technical complications than two-piece implants, as reported in the literature [ 43 , 44 ]. However, zirconia’s main drawback is the bonding difficulty that requires many treatments to increase its wetting capacity [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the load conditions were designed following the ISO 14801 standard 21 . The bite force is variable during mastication 22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%