1990
DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(90)90082-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture stage 4 of the lateral talar dome treated arthroscopically using biofix for fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Classically, conservative treatment forgrades I-II 6 and removal of the fragment and local curettage for grades III-IV 13,14 has been indicated. However, Kristensen et al 8 and Kelbérine et al 7 have recently introduced arthroscopic osteosynthesis as a treatment for osteochondral lesions of the anterior aspect of the talar dome, with satisfactory functional results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Classically, conservative treatment forgrades I-II 6 and removal of the fragment and local curettage for grades III-IV 13,14 has been indicated. However, Kristensen et al 8 and Kelbérine et al 7 have recently introduced arthroscopic osteosynthesis as a treatment for osteochondral lesions of the anterior aspect of the talar dome, with satisfactory functional results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time, arthroscopic osteosynthesis for acute lesion of the talar dome is recommended. 7,8 We present a case of a combined fracture of the body of the talus and the talar dome, and its simultaneous arthroscopically assisted osteosynthesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current literature does not provide definitive criteria for conservative treatment, which can be initiated in acute, subacute, and chronic injury, up to one year after the onset of injury [ 32 , 39 ]. The accepted contraindication of non-operative treatment is a displaced intra-articular osteochondral fragment [ 40 ].…”
Section: Conservative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are used for internal fixation of fractures of the malleolus [6,7,11,15,19,21,24,35,39], of the calcaneus [27], of the tibial head [21,25,40), of the talus [21,22,29], instabilities of the glenohumeral joint [23,44], lateral clavicle fractures [21], acromio-clavicular instabilities [21], radial head fractures [21,40], olecranon fractures [21,37,40] fractures [21,40], refixation of flake fractures of the femur, humerus and patella [21,35], humeral condyles [40], patella and distal femur [40] and anterior spondylodesis in cervical interbody fusion by plates and screws [10]. Most of these bioresorbable devices are made of polyglycolid acid (PGA) [21,29,40] or polylactid acid (PLA) [10,11,15,23,27,35,37,40,44] or polydioxanon (PDS) [21]. The Finish group around Rokkanen et al …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%