1986
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractures of posterior teeth in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
74
0
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
74
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Therefore, adhesive restorations are useful to reinforce the tooth weaken by cavity preparation. 43 The findings of the present study are consistent with those of previous investigations 45,46,47 , which consider that acid etching and adhesive techniques do reinforce dental structure in a way that the stiffness values of restored teeth approximate the values of sound teeth. Ceramic inlays with 1/2 or 1/3 of the intercuspal distance, luted with resin cements, can recover tooth strength near that of intact teeth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 Therefore, adhesive restorations are useful to reinforce the tooth weaken by cavity preparation. 43 The findings of the present study are consistent with those of previous investigations 45,46,47 , which consider that acid etching and adhesive techniques do reinforce dental structure in a way that the stiffness values of restored teeth approximate the values of sound teeth. Ceramic inlays with 1/2 or 1/3 of the intercuspal distance, luted with resin cements, can recover tooth strength near that of intact teeth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…found in their study that fewer fractures occur in teeth if cavity preparation is conservative. 47 The findings of present study, between fracture resistance of intact unprepared tooth and tooth restored with Bulk fill hybrid composite resin were in accordance with the studies done by Jensen et al, 46 Ausiello et al, 49 Dalpino et al and de Freitas et al 50 reported no significant difference in fracture resistance between intact teeth and teeth restored with composite resin. De Freitas et al 50 investigated the effect of various adhesive restorative techniques on fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2 According to independent clinical surveys, over 90 percent of fractured teeth have been previously restored. 2,3 The problem is so prominent that it has been coined the "cracked tooth August 7, 2002. syndrome" (see, for example, Ref. 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c). Earlier clinical studies (Cavel et al, 1985;Eakle et al, 1986;Khers et al, 1990;Qian et al, 2013) suggest that cuspal anatomy plays a critical role in the fracture potential of cusps, and a higher fracture frequency is found in nonfunctional cusps than in functional cusps. One possible reason suggested is that the nonfuctional cusp is often smaller and may be more prone to fracture because of its size (Khers et al, 1990) and that occlusal force applied to these cusps will probably have a greater lateral component leading to cuspal fracture (Cavel et al, 1985) which could partly explain why the buccal cusp deforms less than the lingual cusp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%