1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990501)85:9<2001::aid-cncr18>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragile histidine triad transcription abnormalities and human papillomavirus E6-E7 mRNA expression in the development of cervical carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed typing of HR HPV in our study did not show any associations between abnormal FHIT transcript expression and presence of specific HR HPV types or all HR HPV taken together. This is consistent with a negative correlation found between the presence of HPV E6/E7 transcripts and abnormal FHIT transcripts in cervical cancers (Segawa et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Detailed typing of HR HPV in our study did not show any associations between abnormal FHIT transcript expression and presence of specific HR HPV types or all HR HPV taken together. This is consistent with a negative correlation found between the presence of HPV E6/E7 transcripts and abnormal FHIT transcripts in cervical cancers (Segawa et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Integration of HPV16 sequences at the FHIT locus has been described but this does not appear to be site specific (Wagatsuma et al, 1990;Wilke et al, 1995). HPV16 sequences were not present in abnormal FHIT transcripts (Muller et al, 1998) and the presence of HR HPV E6/E7 transcripts and abnormal FHIT transcripts were negatively correlated in cervical cancer (Segawa et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar alternative transcripts were recently reported to be cancer-speci®c in a series of cervical carcinomas (Segawa et al, 1999). However, detection of these transcripts in primary HFKs, reported here, does not support the view that they are cancer-speci®c.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%