Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objective:
In the context of primary in-hospital trauma management timely reading of computed tomography (CT) images is critical. However, assessment of the spine is time consuming, fractures can be very subtle, and the potential for under-diagnosis or delayed diagnosis is relevant. 
Artificial intelligence is increasingly employed to assist radiologists with the detection of spinal fractures and prioritization of cases.
Currently, algorithms focusing on the cervical spine are commercially available.
A common approach is the vertebra-wise classification.
Instead of a classification task, we formulate fracture detection as a segmentation task aiming to find and display all individual fracture locations presented in the image.\\ 
Approach:
Based on 195 CT examinations, 454 cervical spine fractures were identified and annotated by radiologists at a tertiary trauma centre. 
We trained for the detection a U-Net via 4-fold-cross validation to segment spine fractures and the spine via a multi-task loss. 
We further compared advantages of two image reformation approaches - straightened curved planar reformatted (CPR) around the spine and spinal canal aligned volumes of interest (VOI) - to achieve a unified vertebral alignment in comparison to processing the Cartesian data directly.
Main results:
Of the three data versions (Cartesian, reformatted, VOI) the VOI approach showed the best detection rate and a reduced computation time. The proposed algorithm was able to detect 87.2\% of cervical spine fractures at an average number of false positives of 3.5 per case. Evaluation of the method on a public spine dataset resulted in 0.9 false positive detections per cervical spine case. 
Significance:
The display of individual fracture locations as provided with high sensitivity by the proposed voxel classification based fracture detection has the potential to support the trauma CT reading workflow by reducing missed findings. 
Objective:
In the context of primary in-hospital trauma management timely reading of computed tomography (CT) images is critical. However, assessment of the spine is time consuming, fractures can be very subtle, and the potential for under-diagnosis or delayed diagnosis is relevant. 
Artificial intelligence is increasingly employed to assist radiologists with the detection of spinal fractures and prioritization of cases.
Currently, algorithms focusing on the cervical spine are commercially available.
A common approach is the vertebra-wise classification.
Instead of a classification task, we formulate fracture detection as a segmentation task aiming to find and display all individual fracture locations presented in the image.\\ 
Approach:
Based on 195 CT examinations, 454 cervical spine fractures were identified and annotated by radiologists at a tertiary trauma centre. 
We trained for the detection a U-Net via 4-fold-cross validation to segment spine fractures and the spine via a multi-task loss. 
We further compared advantages of two image reformation approaches - straightened curved planar reformatted (CPR) around the spine and spinal canal aligned volumes of interest (VOI) - to achieve a unified vertebral alignment in comparison to processing the Cartesian data directly.
Main results:
Of the three data versions (Cartesian, reformatted, VOI) the VOI approach showed the best detection rate and a reduced computation time. The proposed algorithm was able to detect 87.2\% of cervical spine fractures at an average number of false positives of 3.5 per case. Evaluation of the method on a public spine dataset resulted in 0.9 false positive detections per cervical spine case. 
Significance:
The display of individual fracture locations as provided with high sensitivity by the proposed voxel classification based fracture detection has the potential to support the trauma CT reading workflow by reducing missed findings. 
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.