1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00421-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frameless Stereotactic Lesion Contour-guided Surgery Using a Computer-navigated Microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even stereotactically directed navigation systems providing intraoperative radiologic resection guidance cannot solve the problem of defining tumor margins in radiologically well delineated tumor areas, because shift phenomena during resection of large tumor volumes occur. [25][26][27] Since the extent of resection determines survival in…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even stereotactically directed navigation systems providing intraoperative radiologic resection guidance cannot solve the problem of defining tumor margins in radiologically well delineated tumor areas, because shift phenomena during resection of large tumor volumes occur. [25][26][27] Since the extent of resection determines survival in…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extent of resection was rated as biopsy (stereotactic or frameless stereotactic using Nashold needle and burr hole), partial resection (residual tumour visible on postsurgical contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) or macroscopically complete resection (no residual tumour visible on postoperative contrast enhanced MRI). All procedures were augmented by a surgical navigation system [19,20], additionally by fl uorescence guided resection using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) since May 2009 [22]. Altogether, 16 patients received biopsy only (deep seated, eloquent, non-resectable tumours), 18 patients received partial resection (to preserve eloquent brain areas) and 14 patients had GTR.…”
Section: Patient Population and Surgical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk areas as well as the lesion volumes were segmented and displayed in different colors on the scans and projected through the microscope onto the intraoperative operating field. Thus, the operation microscope (Pentero, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to integrate the functional risk maps for targeting and guiding the resection of the lesions intraoperatively using standard microsurgical techniques as described earlier [25]. During lesion resection, the ocular displayed risk areas were respected and lesioning of risk brain areas avoided, especially concerning speech- and memory-relevant cortical areas and the visual tract.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%