Framing Social Problems in Social Entrepreneurship

Hervieux, Chantal; Voltan, Annika

doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3252-1

Cited by 75 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To conclude, the insignificance of the sector in which the social enterprise operates may be related to a framing problem, missing clear identification and definition [84]; thus, it limits the application to research. Management and entrepreneurial experience also lacked significance.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Value Co-Creation on Social Enterprise Growth: Moderating Mechanism of Environment Dynamics

Pellegrini

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The traditional approach to demonstrate the growth processes of social enterprise still relies heavily on an internal perspective of resource and capability accumulation. However, it is insufficient to explain why some social enterprises grow quickly while other social enterprises do not. Based on the theory of value co-creation, this paper proposes a theoretical framework of the effect of value co-creation on social enterprise growth. A survey was conducted in China across 29 provinces and municipalities from October 2015 to March 2016, through the efforts of a market research group. The final number of usable questionnaires was 172. Specifically, by employing hierarchical regression models, this paper partially confirms the positive impact of value co-creation on social enterprise growth, while environment dynamics have a negative moderating effect on the relationship between value creation and the growth of social enterprises.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Value Co-Creation on Social Enterprise Growth: Moderating Mechanism of Environment Dynamics

Pellegrini

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The growing involvement of the private sector in the design and management of urban public space has prompted some critical scholars to foresee the "end of public space‖ (Langstraat & Van Melik, 2013). A powerful mobilization movement seems to have been activated, which supports the growth of social entrepreneurs as agents of change (Hervieux & Voltan, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Secinaro¹,

Corvo²,

Brescia³

et al. 2019

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to systematically review literature concerning hybrid structures, that is, structures that are used to implement various forms of management. More specifically, the authors aim to answer two questions: can the evolution of hybrid organizations be analyzed and mapped, and if so, what are the factors that govern their development? The document is based on a systematic review approach of Little et al. (2009), which aims to make the selection of literature and the review process transparent and replicable following steps, eliminating the problem of prejudice to ensure objectivity of the research and credibility in the results as demonstrated by Rosenthal (1979) and Cooper (2003). What emerges from the literature of hybrid organizations seen from the point of view of NPM, the concept of Paradox, PPPs and Hybrid Impact is very interesting because by tidying up the concepts that various scholars have found it is possible to define what have been the factors that influenced the evolution of hybrid organizations giving a historical definition and helping to understand the roots of the concept and specifically where these new entities will generate impact. Several documents have analyzed the contribution of these approaches to the improvement of Management, Decision-Making, Identity Work, Governance, Hybrid Laws, Microfinance Institutions MFIs and Corporatizing. Through this research the authors hope to contribute to the academic and professional community by summarizing the known literature and suggesting paths for further research precisely because it is necessary the cooperation.

show abstract

“…Dessa forma, o empreendedorismo social configura-se como uma nova maneira de melhorar a qualidade de vida e os índices de desenvolvimento humano (Zahra, Gedajlovic, Neubaum, & Shulman, 2009), geralmente por meio da inovação (Hervieux & Voltan, 2018;Nicholls, 2006), combinando sua missão social com atividades www empreendedoras (Saebi, Foss, & Linder, 2018). Assim, em uma visão ampla, Austin et al, (2006, p. 2, tradução nossa), definem-no como uma "atividade inovadora, criadora de valor social que pode ocorrer dentro ou entre os setores sem fins lucrativos, empresariais ou governamentais".…”

Section: Empreendedorismo Socialunclassified

Ecossistema de Inovação Social e os Níveis de Intensidade das Parcerias Intersetoriais do Empreendedor Social

Morais-da-Silva

Segatto

Carvalho

et al. 2020

REGEPE Entrep. Small Bus. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: analisar os níveis de intensidade das parcerias intersetoriais e a forma como elas podem auxiliar na construção de um ecossistema de inovação social mais efetivo para o empreendedor social.Método: três casos de organizações sociais e de suas parcerias, no contexto brasileiro, foram investigados. Os dados foram coletados por meio de 25 entrevistas com os parceiros desses projetos, e em 78 documentos. A análise dos dados foi desenvolvida por meio da técnica de análise qualitativa de conteúdo.Originalidade/Relevância: este estudo contribui para o esclarecimento da lacuna de pesquisa, existente na área de ecossistema de inovação social, principalmente no que se refere à dinâmica de relacionamento entre os atores que o compõem. Além disso, este estudo fornece alguns insights no campo prático, uma vez que o desenvolvimento de ecossistemas de inovação social pode fomentar a ação do empreendedor social.Resultados: o estudo apontou que os principais atores envolvidos nas ações colaborativas, como empresas e empreendedores sociais, ONGs, empresas privadas, fundos de investimento de impacto e universidades constitui um dos elementos de maior importância para a efetividade do ecossistema de inovação social. Foi constatada, também, a existência de níveis de colaboração entre os casos investigados, sendo parcerias de primeiro a terceiro níveis, e parcerias de nível institucional (agentes intermediários).Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: primeiramente, este estudo sugere um conceito para o ecossistema de inovação social, visto que a literatura ainda é incipiente no assunto. Além disso, ao abordar a dinâmica em níveis, pela qual os atores do ecossistema de inovação social interagem, por meio de parcerias intersetoriais.

show abstract

Framing Social Problems in Social Entrepreneurship

Cited by 75 publications

References 33 publications

The Effect of Value Co-Creation on Social Enterprise Growth: Moderating Mechanism of Environment Dynamics

The Effect of Value Co-Creation on Social Enterprise Growth: Moderating Mechanism of Environment Dynamics

Hybrid organizations: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

Ecossistema de Inovação Social e os Níveis de Intensidade das Parcerias Intersetoriais do Empreendedor Social

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About