2006
DOI: 10.1080/13537110500503786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Francophone Bilingualism, Inter-Group Contact, and Opposition to Sovereignty Among QuéBec Francophones

Abstract: Using ecological inference methods and a dataset that combines results from the 1995 Québec referendum, the federal and provincial elections of 1997 and 1998, and data from the Canadian census, this article considers the relationship between the local linguistic environment and francophone support for Québec sovereignty. Outside of Montréal, we find that the linguistic composition of the population has little direct influence on support for sovereignty but that support for sovereignty declines as the proportio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, an increased presence of the "other" in a locality does not increase the likelihood of voting for the BQ, whereas it does increase the likelihood that nationalism will be an important predictor of support for the BQ. This corroborates findings in the literature (Piroth et al, 2006;Lublin and Voss, 2002) that an increase in the share of non-francophones at the local level either has no effect (outside of Montreal) or a negative effect (in Montreal) on francophone's support for Quebec sovereignty. In terms of our second contextual variable our preliminary analysis shows that the percent of unemployment has a significant negative effect on support for the BQ, suggesting that the higher the percentage of unemployed people in a locality the smaller the likelihood that an individual will vote for the Bloc Qu eb ecois.…”
Section: Reproducing the Analysis Using Representative Datasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In other words, an increased presence of the "other" in a locality does not increase the likelihood of voting for the BQ, whereas it does increase the likelihood that nationalism will be an important predictor of support for the BQ. This corroborates findings in the literature (Piroth et al, 2006;Lublin and Voss, 2002) that an increase in the share of non-francophones at the local level either has no effect (outside of Montreal) or a negative effect (in Montreal) on francophone's support for Quebec sovereignty. In terms of our second contextual variable our preliminary analysis shows that the percent of unemployment has a significant negative effect on support for the BQ, suggesting that the higher the percentage of unemployed people in a locality the smaller the likelihood that an individual will vote for the Bloc Qu eb ecois.…”
Section: Reproducing the Analysis Using Representative Datasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Burden and Kimball (1998), for example, use King‐based estimates of district‐level ticket‐splitting rates as dependent variables in second‐stage regressions which examine why individuals cast split‐ticket ballots. Other examples of EI–R and variants of this two‐stage statistical technique can be found in Kimball and Burden (1998), Voss and Lublin (1998), Cohen, Kousser, and Sides (1999), Wolbrecht and Corder (1999), Voss and Miller (2000), Gay (2001), Redding and James (2001), Burden and Kimball (2002), Kousser (2002), Lublin and Voss (2002), and Piroth, Serre, and Lublin (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%