2021
DOI: 10.1017/nps.2020.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Fraternal” Other: Negotiating Ethnic and Religious Identities at a Muslim Sacred Site in Northern Cyprus

Abstract: This article shows how everyday religious practices inform the processes of social identification, complicate presumed ethno-religious categories, and mediate local cultural differences in face of political and cultural hegemonic practices. In the context of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, a de facto state recognized only by Turkey, Turkish Cypriots and Turks are considered to share an ethnicity and religion. This “overlap” has been employed to justify Turkey’s military intervention and its political,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By way of illustration, in the 1946 Census of the British colonial administration of Cyprus, one can observe an ethno-religious dichotomy between “Greek Orthodox” and “Moslem Turkish” citizens (Figure 2), whereas by 1960, when the Republic of Cyprus was granted its independence (Dodd 2010), the dichotomy was enacted in ethno-racial terms, differentiating between “Greeks” and “Turks” (Figure 3). In effect, this shift in census-based categorizations indicates how religion was substituted as a source of identification with an ethno-national and socially constructed (Şahin 2011) perception of Greece and Turkey as the motherlands of individuals who, during the Ottoman era, respectively clung to their Orthodox and Muslim identities (Harmanşah 2021, 4).
Figure 2. Ethno-religious distinction between “Greek Orthodox” and “Moslem Turkish” citizens Source: Census of Population and Agriculture 1946 , by British Government of Cyprus, 1949,
Figure 3. Ethno-racial distinction between “Greeks” and “Turks” Source: Census of Population and Agriculture 1960 , by Republic of Cyprus, 1960,
…”
Section: Historical Context: Religion and The Ethnosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By way of illustration, in the 1946 Census of the British colonial administration of Cyprus, one can observe an ethno-religious dichotomy between “Greek Orthodox” and “Moslem Turkish” citizens (Figure 2), whereas by 1960, when the Republic of Cyprus was granted its independence (Dodd 2010), the dichotomy was enacted in ethno-racial terms, differentiating between “Greeks” and “Turks” (Figure 3). In effect, this shift in census-based categorizations indicates how religion was substituted as a source of identification with an ethno-national and socially constructed (Şahin 2011) perception of Greece and Turkey as the motherlands of individuals who, during the Ottoman era, respectively clung to their Orthodox and Muslim identities (Harmanşah 2021, 4).
Figure 2. Ethno-religious distinction between “Greek Orthodox” and “Moslem Turkish” citizens Source: Census of Population and Agriculture 1946 , by British Government of Cyprus, 1949,
Figure 3. Ethno-racial distinction between “Greeks” and “Turks” Source: Census of Population and Agriculture 1960 , by Republic of Cyprus, 1960,
…”
Section: Historical Context: Religion and The Ethnosmentioning
confidence: 99%