2022
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2083701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-living monitoring of ambulatory activity after treatments for lower extremity musculoskeletal cancers using an accelerometer-based wearable – a new paradigm to outcome assessment in musculoskeletal oncology?

Abstract: The institution of one or more of the authors (CG, SF) has received, during the study period, funding from the Children with Cancer UK Charity, Sarcoma UK Charity, and Shear's Foundation and Research and Capability (RCF). All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Disability and Rehabilitation Journal editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next steps would be to conduct a larger study with sufficient power using purposive sampling strategy to validate the MMC approach. In future, other methods such as stopwatch, wearables like accelerometery in the clinic [ 10 ] and community [ 32 ] or fitbits, IMUs, mobile apps or Xsens could be utilised to collect outcomes alongside MMC. Xsens will be a useful comparison to MMC, if joint range of motion is the area of focus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The next steps would be to conduct a larger study with sufficient power using purposive sampling strategy to validate the MMC approach. In future, other methods such as stopwatch, wearables like accelerometery in the clinic [ 10 ] and community [ 32 ] or fitbits, IMUs, mobile apps or Xsens could be utilised to collect outcomes alongside MMC. Xsens will be a useful comparison to MMC, if joint range of motion is the area of focus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…writing-up reports, presenting at conferences and submitting to journals. After successfully publishing two key papers from this large project, on the topics of the use of triaxial accelerometer-based body worn monitor technology in the clinic [ 10 ] and in the community [ 32 ] respectively; this current paper which investigated a different dataset of MMC outcomes to answer questions about the feasibility and clinical applicability of the use of depth sensors for MMC was compiled. The current paper is different from the previous two publications, as it investigates the MMC approach which has never been done before for this cancer group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te Axivity AX3 accelerometer (Axivity Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), a small waterproof device (23 × 32.5 × 7.6 mm; 11 g), was used to measure sleep quantity and quality. Te Axivity AX3 was used in the UK Biobank study [29] and has been previously used in cancer survivors [30][31][32]. Te participants were instructed to wear the device on their nondominant wrist for seven consecutive days, except while swimming.…”
Section: Sleep Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could for instance allow us to evaluate rehabilitation procedures or treatment choices for specific diseases and to assess the impact of treatments on pathologies such as musculoskeletal tumors of the lower limbs or neurological disorders (Parkinson's disease for instance). The current monitoring of the effects of these FLE treatments is only carried out via calculations of general metrics (steps/day, ambulatory bouts/day) [19] when our graphical tool will enable a refined follow-up displaying an enhanced macro analysis of gait phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%