1996
DOI: 10.1016/0079-6700(95)00021-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free-radical polymerization in inverse microemulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monomer conversion was determined by the dilatometry and the final conversion of several samples was controlled by the gravimetric method. The contraction factor (CF) of AAm was estimated to be 0.319 which is in a good agreement with the literature values [7,8]. The average particle sizes were determined by the light scattering method.…”
Section: Recipes and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The monomer conversion was determined by the dilatometry and the final conversion of several samples was controlled by the gravimetric method. The contraction factor (CF) of AAm was estimated to be 0.319 which is in a good agreement with the literature values [7,8]. The average particle sizes were determined by the light scattering method.…”
Section: Recipes and Proceduressupporting
confidence: 74%
“…28 In this case, the released coemulsifier from polymer particles (pentanol is not compatible with PSt) Polym. J .…”
Section: Kinetic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics and mechanism of the inverse microemulsion polymerization are especially well understood [4]. This is not true for the inverse miniemulsion polymerization where few data on polymerization kinetics are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%