1990
DOI: 10.1063/1.346425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freezing of the polarization fluctuations in lead magnesium niobate relaxors

Abstract: The dielectric relaxation of a solid solution of 10-mol % lead titanate in lead magnesium niobate is found to be similar to the magnetic relaxation in spin-glass systems.1–3 Based on this analogy, it is proposed that the relaxor ferroelectric is a polar-glassy system which has thermally activated polarization fluctuations above a static freezing temperature. An activation energy and freezing temperature of 0.0407 eV and 291.5 K, respectively, were found by analyzing the frequency dependence of the temperature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

27
696
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,257 publications
(726 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
27
696
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the highest to the lowest, these are (i) the Burns temperature T B , 5 (ii) the intermediate temperature T * , [6][7][8] (iii) the frequency-dependent temperature of the dielectric permittivity peak T m , and (iv) the ferroelectric phase transition temperature T C [or the freezing temperature T f in the case in which this transition is absent as, e.g., in Pb(Mg 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 (PMN)]. 9 Above T B , the phase is paraelectric without PNRs, and the structure is essentially the same as the paraelectric state of normal ferroelectrics. Below T B , in the so-called ergodic relaxor phase, the frustration between electric and spatial instabilities induces PNRs, despite the fact that the macroscopic crystal symmetry is identical to that above T B .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the highest to the lowest, these are (i) the Burns temperature T B , 5 (ii) the intermediate temperature T * , [6][7][8] (iii) the frequency-dependent temperature of the dielectric permittivity peak T m , and (iv) the ferroelectric phase transition temperature T C [or the freezing temperature T f in the case in which this transition is absent as, e.g., in Pb(Mg 1/3 Nb 2/3 )O 3 (PMN)]. 9 Above T B , the phase is paraelectric without PNRs, and the structure is essentially the same as the paraelectric state of normal ferroelectrics. Below T B , in the so-called ergodic relaxor phase, the frustration between electric and spatial instabilities induces PNRs, despite the fact that the macroscopic crystal symmetry is identical to that above T B .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lead-based relaxor ferroelectrics with the perovskite structure exhibit a strong frequencydispersive dielectric permittivity with broad temperature dependence, superior piezoelectric response, and other peculiar properties [1][2][3]. In particular, the dielectric properties peak in a region of the phase diagram (pressure-temperature-composition) where the dielectric constant shows frequency dispersion and has a maximum with decreasing temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, their high permittivity and high piezoelectric constants make them suitable for applications in devices for sonar or medical imaging [1]. While extensive theoretical [3][4][5][6][7] and experimental studies [1][2][3][7][8][9][10][11][12] have advanced the fundamental understanding of relaxor behavior, their properties are still poorly understood. The difficulties stem from the complexity of these materials, which have a high degree of compositional, structural and polar disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Higher occupancy of Sr on the A1-site leads to an increased t A1 tolerance factor for x = 2, such that t A1 (x = 2) > t A1 (x = 3) , Table 1. This multi-site occupancy by Sr generates two contributing factors which favour relaxor behaviour: 1) A-site disorder; and 2) reduced octahedral tilting due to the increase in A1-cation size (increased t A1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f is the frequency of the applied ac field, f 0 is the limiting response frequency, E a is the activation energy, k is Boltzmann's constant and T m is the maximum of the relative permittivity measured with ac field of frequency, f. [19][20][21] The polarisation freezes out at T f , the static freezing temperature, also known as the Vogel-Fulcher temperature. 19,20 Higher occupancy of Sr on the A1-site leads to an increased t A1 tolerance factor for x = 2, such that t A1 (x = 2) > t A1 (x = 3) , Table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%