Frege und die kontinentalen Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie

Heinemann, Anna-Sophie

doi:10.1080/01445340.2019.1622867

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although value philosophy is as old as philosophy itself, Rudolf Hermann Lotze (1817Lotze ( -1881, one of the most influential German philosophers in the 19th century, introduced the concepts of value and validity (Geltung) into philosophy (Milkov, n.d.;Oldemeyer, 1980;Schmidt and Schischkoff, 1965). Lotze influenced more or less all philosophical schools in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including phenomenology (Husserl), neo-Kantianism (Windelband, Rickert), pragmatism (James), Frege's logic, Dilthey's philosophy of life and analytical philosophy (Gabriel, 1989;Heinemann, 2019;Milkov, 2017Milkov, , 2021. Following discussions in marketing studies (Eggert et al, 2019), social enterprise studies (Dees, 2011;Kokko, 2018;Santos, 2012) and public management studies (Eriksson et al, 2020;Kelly et al, 2002;Talbot, 2009), philosophical value theory highlights the value determinateness of human and organizational performance (Arnould, 2014;Krijnen, 2006;Lautermann, 2013).…”

Section: Philosophical Value Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Social value cocreation: a mode of value cocreation

Haase

2021

SEJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to present a value cocreation framework that furthers understanding of social value cocreation. Design/methodology/approach This paper is an interdisciplinary conceptual analysis drawing on social enterprise studies, marketing research and philosophical value theory. It applies a visible-hand approach to the study of market relationships and, in line with philosophical research strategies, unfolds its analysis using conceptual distinctions. Findings This study provides a framework that substantiates the distinction between two modes of value cocreation and identifies the structure of the social enterprise business model. It explains how social enterprises can be conceived as role models for for-profit organizations, and it elucidates why social value cocreation is a demanding objective. Research limitations/implications This paper develops an integrative, nondichotomist view of value cocreation that does not conceptualize social and economic value cocreation as opposing goals. Practical implications Social enterprises can use the business model structure and two modes of value cocreation and view themselves as role models for for-profit organizations. Social implications This paper applies a visible-hand approach to both for-profit organizations and social enterprises. Using its framework, for-profit organizations can reflect on the consequences of their actions on society and how social value cocreation can improve social enterprise effectiveness. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first to bridge service-oriented approaches to marketing and social enterprise studies using philosophical value theory to improve understanding of social value cocreation.

show abstract

Section: Philosophical Value Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Social value cocreation: a mode of value cocreation

Haase

2021

SEJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Frege und die kontinentalen Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Social value cocreation: a mode of value cocreation

Social value cocreation: a mode of value cocreation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About