French adaptation of the new Knee Society Scoring System for total knee arthroplasty

Debette, Caroline; Parratte, Sébastien; Maucort-Boulch, Delphine; Blanc, Guillaume Le; Pauly, Vanessa; Lustig, Sébastien; Servien, Elvire; Neyret, Philippe; Argenson, Jean-Noël

doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.025

Cited by 88 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, the activity The expectation domain showed a similar correlation with the physical function and general health subscales of the Korean SF-36. Our study shows low levels of correlation when compared with the Dutch [22] and French studies [6] but similar correlations when compared with the Japanese version of the 2011 KS Score [10]. A possible explanation for this finding could be the difference in cultural background between the European and Asian populations.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 56%

“…The current study was conducted to develop the Korean version of the 2011 KS Score for Korean-speaking patients who undergo TKA, which was developed through crosscultural adaptation, and to investigate its psychometric properties. Similar versions of the 2011 KS Score have been translated to Japanese [10], French [6], Dutch [22], and Chinese [16] .). We acknowledge certain limitations of our study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System

Kim

Basur²,

Park

et al. 2017

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The 2011 Knee Society Score Ó (2011 KS Score Ó ) is used to characterize the expectations, symptoms, physical activity, and satisfaction of patients who undergo TKA and is widely used to assess the outcome of TKA. However, it has not been adapted or validated for use in Korea.Questions/purposes We developed a Korean version of the 2011 KS Score and evaluated the (1) test-retest reliability, (2) convergent validity, and (3) responsiveness of the Korean version. Methods The Korean version of the 2011 KS Score was derived by using a well-established translational procedure based on international guidelines, which include translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, pretesting, and submission for appraisal. A total of 123 patients with knee osteoarthritis who were scheduled to undergo TKA were recruited for the study. Ninety percent of the patients (111 of 123) were women, which is an exact representation of the Korean population having TKAs. To evaluate reliability, the patients were evaluated twice during a 4-week interval using the questionnaire. Reliability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and internal consistency by using Cronbach's alpha to determine the validity of the Korean version of the 2011 KS Score. The patients were evaluated by using the validated Korean versions of the WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used for validation. Responsiveness was determined by calculating the standardized response mean from the preoperative and postoperative test scores in One of the authors certifies that he (TKK) has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount of USD 10,000-USD 100,000, from Smith & Nephew, Inc (Seoul, Republic of Korea). All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1 editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that his or her institution approved or waived approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research. This work was performed at the Joint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. the Korean version of the 2011 KS Score. To address the gender disparity in our study we identified 53 males who underwent TKA for osteoarthritis after completion of this study and generated age-matched controlled groups to evaluate construct validity and responsiveness in Korean males. Results The reliability proved good to excellent with an ICC between 0.69 and 0.85, depending on the clinical properties tested, which included the following: symptoms, satisfaction, expectation, and total functional activity consisting of functional activity, standard activity, advanced activity, and discretionary activity. All subscales showed good to excellent internal consistency indicated by Chronbach's alpha (range, 0.83-0.92 Ele...

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 56%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System

Kim

Basur²,

Park

et al. 2017

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This leads to discrepancies between different patient populations in terms of participation rates, potentially lessening the value of the outcomes measurement. This deficiency was a criticism of the Knee Society Knee Score long form with a significant proportion of patients failing to complete items relating to the ability to carry heavy loads (eg, shopping bags) and items requiring the respondent to identify three knee activities they consider personally important [2,3]. Because patients who do not respond to followup surveys, or do not complete the survey, tend to report significantly poorer outcomes than do responders [11], this potential source of response bias should be considered in evaluating the results of patient-reported outcome measures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Knee Society Short Form Reduces Respondent Burden in the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes

Scuderi

Sikorskii

Bourne

et al. 2016

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Feasibility was evaluated based on the response rate and presence of a floor or ceiling effect (>15 % of patients reach the minimum or maximum score) [14]. The testretest reliability of the KSS was determined by assessing the reproducibility of the results obtained 7 days apart without any treatment changes and was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95 % confidence intervals [3].…”

Section: Psychometric Characteristics Of the Japanese Kssmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Scoring System for osteoarthritic knee with total knee arthroplasty

Hamamoto

Ito

Furu

et al. 2015

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

French adaptation of the new Knee Society Scoring System for total knee arthroplasty

Abstract: Level III.

Cited by 88 publications

References 30 publications

Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System

Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System

The Knee Society Short Form Reduces Respondent Burden in the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Scoring System for osteoarthritic knee with total knee arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About