1986
DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198604001-00398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Analysis of the Effects of Shoe Cushioning on Dynamic Shock in Running

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean for 0 cm height or lowimpact dance movement was not included in the regression for height' to accommodate (Dufek & Bates, 1990;Lees, 1981;McNitt-Gray, 1991;McNitt-Gray, Barbieri, Anderson, & Irvine, 1991). In running at 3.83 m/s, peak lower leg accelerations are typically 7-8 g with mean frequency components of 2U-25 Hz, and peak skull accelerations Ne 2-3 E with a mean frequency of 3.5 Hz (Shorten;Valiant, & Cooper, 1986;Valiant, 1990). The magnitude and frequency of an impact shock are attenuated by bone and soft tissue between the lower leg and head.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean for 0 cm height or lowimpact dance movement was not included in the regression for height' to accommodate (Dufek & Bates, 1990;Lees, 1981;McNitt-Gray, 1991;McNitt-Gray, Barbieri, Anderson, & Irvine, 1991). In running at 3.83 m/s, peak lower leg accelerations are typically 7-8 g with mean frequency components of 2U-25 Hz, and peak skull accelerations Ne 2-3 E with a mean frequency of 3.5 Hz (Shorten;Valiant, & Cooper, 1986;Valiant, 1990). The magnitude and frequency of an impact shock are attenuated by bone and soft tissue between the lower leg and head.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial research reported substantial reductions in the high frequency components of TA while running in footwear with a midsole, over barefoot conditions. The power spectral density of frequency components above 20 Hz were directly related to shoe midsole hardness [68]. Subsequent studies have shown, that despite some shoes demonstrating significantly reduced cushioning properties when mechanically drop tested [112], no difference in peak TA across various conventional thickness EVA footwear conditions were found [81,112] (Table 2).…”
Section: Running Footwearmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Variations or changes in peak TA observed in the time domain may be a result of changes in low or high frequency bands, or changes in the resonant frequency of the mounting system [67]. These additional signal analysis approaches have been used to provide a more thorough characterisation of the signal components in a range of running studies [15,[68][69][70].…”
Section: Frequency Content Of Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that increased peak ground reaction forces and peak loading rates are important considerations and may be potentially harmful to the runner. 25 , 44 , 70 , 91 - 93 , 112 The externally measured peak vertical ground reaction force with walking and running is approximately 1 to 1.5 times body weight for walking and 2 to 2.9 times body weight for running. 79 Meanwhile, the joint reaction force across the ankle joint with walking and running is up to 5 times body weight and 13 times body weight, respectively.…”
Section: Impact Forces and “Comfort”mentioning
confidence: 99%