2018
DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v41i1.1835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and reasons for missed appointments of outpatient mental health care users in the uMgungundlovu District

Abstract: BackgroundOver the years, there has been a rapid growth in the use of mobile technology which has been proven to increase treatment adherence. Short message services may improve service delivery through appointment reminders and improve communication between health care workers and patients. Missed appointments are becoming common amongst mental health care users, and this has a significant economic burden on mental health symptoms.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to determine the frequency and reasons for m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(14 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a high rate can have a major impact on mental healthcare which can lead to clinical and administrative challenges for the staff as well as increasing the risk of hospitalization for the patient, overall increasing the cost of the healthcare system. [3,9] Among the different, demographic and administrative characteristics studied, only the nature of the service showed a main effect on no-show rates, with services delivered by psychiatrists having the highest rate compared to the other services offered at the mental health clinic. Furthermore, the consultation/orientation visit, which is only given by psychiatrists, was associated with higher no-show rates compared to other types of visits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a high rate can have a major impact on mental healthcare which can lead to clinical and administrative challenges for the staff as well as increasing the risk of hospitalization for the patient, overall increasing the cost of the healthcare system. [3,9] Among the different, demographic and administrative characteristics studied, only the nature of the service showed a main effect on no-show rates, with services delivered by psychiatrists having the highest rate compared to the other services offered at the mental health clinic. Furthermore, the consultation/orientation visit, which is only given by psychiatrists, was associated with higher no-show rates compared to other types of visits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2005; Williamson et al. , 2017; Ramlucken and Sibiya, 2018). It is clear however, that DNAs are strongly associated with a significant reduction in productivity and effectiveness of services, a deterioration in therapeutic working relationships (Lee et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are contrasting thoughts on the idea of DNAs, and whilst patients and administrative staff tend to find them frustrating, GPs find them useful for catching up National Health Service when they have fallen behind schedule (Martin et al, 2005;Williamson et al, 2017;Ramlucken and Sibiya, 2018). It is clear however, that DNAs are strongly associated with a significant reduction in productivity and effectiveness of services, a deterioration in therapeutic working relationships (Lee et al, 2019), and increased pressure on emergency services (Ferro et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients miss appointments for a variety of reasons, including logistical (e.g., limited transportation), personal (e.g., forgetting), and health system-related (e.g., lack of communication or shared decision-making regarding referral to BH services, limited appointment availability; Nicholson, 1994; Ramlucken & Sibiya, 2018). Prior studies have found that a longer wait time between a BH referral and scheduled appointment is associated with lower appointment attendance (Gallucci et al, 2005; Loumidis & Shropshire, 1997; Sherman et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%